Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gibbs free energy calculations #1043

Closed
danieleveclani opened this issue May 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Gibbs free energy calculations #1043

danieleveclani opened this issue May 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
support Question regarding this project or underlying method

Comments

@danieleveclani
Copy link

Dear Xtb develepers,

I am one of your users. I am trying to obtain the G value between two interacting molecules using implicit solvent. I have some doubts regarding the calculation of the harmonic contribution and the solvent.

For the DG I use the following equation:

DG = 𝐸 + 𝐺RRHOT + 𝐺solv

𝐺RRHOT = coupled rigid-rotor-harmonic-oscillator approach (vibrational frequency calculations)
𝐺solv = solvation contribution

As E I actually use total energy obtained from the SUMMARY section of the xtb output file.

However, I do not understand if this last contribution (total energy) already includes the correction for the solvent (Gsolv). Can you clarify this for me?

Waiting for a kindly reply.

Best,
Daniele Veclani.

@danieleveclani danieleveclani added the unconfirmed This report has not yet been confirmed by the developers label May 24, 2024
@haneug
Copy link
Member

haneug commented Jun 20, 2024

When you include the ALPB or the GBSA solvation model you already account for Gsolv in the total energy since this is included in your SCF. You can of course also use other (post-SCF) solvation models such as the CPCM-X. In this case, E should be calculated without solvation (so no alpb or gbsa) and then you can add Gsolv from CPCM-X. Note that the GFN methods are parameterized for geometries, frequencies, and non-covalent interactions and not for energies. So you might want to get your E from somewhere else (depending on your application/desired accuracy)

@haneug haneug added support Question regarding this project or underlying method and removed unconfirmed This report has not yet been confirmed by the developers labels Jun 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
support Question regarding this project or underlying method
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants