undo the broken part of the fix

[neb9]

the unit tests are good, but this line's change was absolutely broken. this issue was addressed in an issue, but for some reason never added to repo.

[graik]

Either way ("and" or "or") we get errors from some PDB files, don't we?

[neb9]

The old way works most of the time (when combined with other workarounds) -- the new way does not fix any issue I have seen, and breaks almost every protein. So the old way seems much better, hence this pullreq. It's still not perfect, but it fixes some breakage.

[graik]

Ok, I'll merge as soon as I am back on a real computer.

…

On Dec 28, 2016 21:21, "neb9" ***@***.***> wrote: The old way works most of the time (when combined with other workarounds) -- the new way does not fix any issue I have seen, and breaks almost every protein. So the old way seems much better, hence this pullreq. It's still not perfect, but it fixes some breakage. — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#14 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABxs3YBTpFe4gTnG1wDVbEc8x_UfF87aks5rMsSlgaJpZM4LWqMi> .