Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(spanner): end spans for read-write methods #3629

Merged

Conversation

harshachinta
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@harshachinta harshachinta requested review from a team as code owners February 10, 2025 11:07
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: xs Pull request size is extra small. api: spanner Issues related to the googleapis/java-spanner API. labels Feb 10, 2025
@harshachinta harshachinta added the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Feb 10, 2025
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: s Pull request size is small. and removed size: xs Pull request size is extra small. labels Feb 10, 2025
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: xs Pull request size is extra small. and removed size: s Pull request size is small. labels Feb 10, 2025
@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot merged commit 4a1f99c into googleapis:main Feb 10, 2025
31 of 33 checks passed
@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot removed the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Feb 10, 2025
harshachinta added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2025
gcf-merge-on-green bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2025
Reverts #3629
Reverting to further debug where the sapns are ending. Will reopen if I feel this change is needed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: spanner Issues related to the googleapis/java-spanner API. size: xs Pull request size is extra small.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants