Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unable to use "crane ls" with registry with port #840

Closed
benmoss opened this issue Nov 23, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

Unable to use "crane ls" with registry with port #840

benmoss opened this issue Nov 23, 2020 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@benmoss
Copy link
Contributor

benmoss commented Nov 23, 2020

$ crane ls localhost:5000/foo
2020/11/23 17:52:45 reading tags for localhost:5000: parsing repo "localhost:5000": repository can only contain the runes `abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789_-./`: localhost:5000

Related to #762

@jonjohnsonjr
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry about that :/ this package definitely needs some love.

cc @hasheddan -- you were poking around here recently if you're interested in taking a look.

@hasheddan
Copy link
Contributor

@jonjohnsonjr yep I can take this one 👍

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no
activity. It will automatically close after 30 more days of
inactivity. Reopen the issue with /reopen. Mark the issue as
fresh by adding the comment /remove-lifecycle stale.

@jonjohnsonjr
Copy link
Collaborator

jonjohnsonjr commented Apr 8, 2021

I can't reproduce this:

$ crane ls localhost:1338/ubuntu
latest

From #979 it seems like you maybe ran into:

$ crane ls localhost:1338
2021/04/08 13:16:06 reading tags for localhost:1338: parsing repo "localhost:1338": repository can only contain the runes `abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789_-./`: localhost:1338

Which doesn't work as long as crane ls only list tags?

Instead you can do:

$ crane catalog localhost:1338
ubuntu

@coryrc
Copy link

coryrc commented Apr 8, 2021

Same here, no reproduce.

@benmoss
Copy link
Contributor Author

benmoss commented Apr 9, 2021

Yep I think I somehow confused the repro as you said @jonjohnsonjr , sorry about that

@benmoss benmoss closed this as completed Apr 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants