Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

couldn't find abbreviation for code when run with -d compileunits #362

Open
carlosperate opened this issue Sep 6, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@carlosperate
Copy link

carlosperate commented Sep 6, 2023

With a project built with arm-none-eabi-gcc v12.3, looks like bloaty cannot process the "compileunits":

$ bloaty -d compileunits build-gcc12/MICROBIT 
bloaty: couldn't find abbreviation for code

The same project built with v11.3 does work:

$ bloaty -d compileunits build-gcc11/MICROBIT
    FILE SIZE        VM SIZE    
 --------------  -------------- 
  63.3%  2.09Mi  35.5%   134Ki    [194 Others]
   7.1%   242Ki   0.0%       0    [section .debug_loclists]
   3.7%   126Ki   0.0%       0    [Unmapped]
   0.0%       0  29.1%   110Ki    [section .heap]
   3.1%   105Ki  27.7%   105Ki    [section .softdevice]
   2.4%  82.7Ki   0.4%  1.34Ki    /Users/microbit-carlos/workspace/carlos/docker-microbit-toolchain/rmfolder/microbit-v2-samples/libraries/codal-microbit-v2/source/bluetooth/MicroBitBLEManager.cpp
   1.9%  63.8Ki   0.5%  1.79Ki    /Users/microbit-carlos/workspace/carlos/docker-microbit-toolchain/rmfolder/microbit-v2-samples/libraries/codal-microbit-v2/model/MicroBit.cpp
   1.7%  58.6Ki   0.0%       0    [section .debug_frame]
   1.7%  56.4Ki   1.4%  5.36Ki    /Users/microbit-carlos/workspace/carlos/docker-microbit-toolchain/rmfolder/microbit-v2-samples/source/main.cpp
   1.5%  50.8Ki   0.6%  2.40Ki    /Users/microbit-carlos/workspace/carlos/docker-microbit-toolchain/rmfolder/microbit-v2-samples/libraries/codal-microbit-v2/source/MicroBitPowerManager.cpp
   1.4%  47.7Ki   0.9%  3.38Ki    /Users/microbit-carlos/workspace/carlos/docker-microbit-toolchain/rmfolder/microbit-v2-samples/libraries/codal-nrf52/source/NRF52ADC.cpp
   1.4%  46.2Ki   0.0%     152    /Users/microbit-carlos/workspace/carlos/docker-microbit-toolchain/rmfolder/microbit-v2-samples/source/samples/OOB.cpp
   1.3%  44.1Ki   0.1%     352    /Users/microbit-carlos/workspace/carlos/docker-microbit-toolchain/rmfolder/microbit-v2-samples/libraries/codal-microbit-v2/source/MicroBitLog.cpp
   1.3%  43.0Ki   0.1%     264    /Users/microbit-carlos/workspace/carlos/docker-microbit-toolchain/rmfolder/microbit-v2-samples/libraries/codal-microbit-v2/source/bluetooth/MicroBitPartialFlashingService.cpp
   1.3%  43.0Ki   0.4%  1.39Ki    /Users/microbit-carlos/workspace/carlos/docker-microbit-toolchain/rmfolder/microbit-v2-samples/libraries/codal-microbit-v2/source/MicroBitAudio.cpp
   1.2%  41.6Ki   0.0%       0    [section .debug_rnglists]
   1.2%  39.6Ki   0.6%  2.11Ki    /Users/microbit-carlos/workspace/carlos/docker-microbit-toolchain/rmfolder/microbit-v2-samples/libraries/codal-microbit-v2/source/MicroBitUSBFlashManager.cpp
   1.2%  39.2Ki   0.9%  3.44Ki    /Users/microbit-carlos/workspace/carlos/docker-microbit-toolchain/rmfolder/microbit-v2-samples/libraries/codal-nrf52/source/NRF52Pin.cpp
   1.1%  38.8Ki   0.5%  1.78Ki    /Users/microbit-carlos/workspace/carlos/docker-microbit-toolchain/rmfolder/microbit-v2-samples/libraries/codal-core/source/driver-models/Serial.cpp
   1.1%  38.7Ki   0.9%  3.48Ki    /Users/microbit-carlos/workspace/carlos/docker-microbit-toolchain/rmfolder/microbit-v2-samples/libraries/codal-core/source/core/CodalFiber.cpp
   1.1%  37.6Ki   0.4%  1.57Ki    /Users/microbit-carlos/workspace/carlos/docker-microbit-toolchain/rmfolder/microbit-v2-samples/libraries/codal-nrf52/source/NRF52Serial.cpp
 100.0%  3.31Mi 100.0%   378Ki    TOTAL

So I'm guessing something might have changed in the latest release.

The two elf/dwarf files used for testing:

And, in case it's useful to have the full project with a build folder for arm-none-eabi-gcc v11 and another for v12:

As a test, I built bloaty in Ubuntu 23.04 with their default gcc v12.2 and run it on itself with -d compileunits, and that worked fined.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant