Project Status Update #1367
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
Thanks for bringing this up @nodivbyzero I was planning in giving you and perhaps a few others after the amazing job you’ve been doing ❤️ the permissions to merge and cut releases. will try to answer regardless:
Not sure a scheduled release cadence is required, WDYT? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks for the update! Regarding release cadence, your approach makes sense to me. Prioritizing security fixes and critical updates ASAP while giving features and validations a bit more time for review seems like a solid balance. I don’t think a strict schedule is necessary either, but maybe having some loose guidelines could help align expectations. Would love to hear others’ thoughts as well! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hope it is okay if I chip in here. Personally I don't think there needs to be a schedule - This is an Open Source project being run by people in their free time, so I think it is unreasonable for anyone to expect things run on a schedule. What I think is more important is that the project appears to be active - which is why I'm happy to hear that @nodivbyzero and others have been granted release permissions! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi @deankarn ,
Contributors are submitting PRs nearly every day.
Currently, the
go-playground/validator
repository has 84 open PRs, and the backlog continues to grow.Some of these PRs are valuable and have already been approved.
I’d like to ask:
Looking forward to your thoughts.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions