Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Proposal: Decentralization of gitea repositories? #14380

Closed
Kreyren opened this issue Jan 18, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Proposal: Decentralization of gitea repositories? #14380

Kreyren opened this issue Jan 18, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first.

Comments

@Kreyren
Copy link
Contributor

Kreyren commented Jan 18, 2021

Inspired by zeronet's git service proposing to implement decentralization of repositories so that the instance doesn't have to host everything by themselves.
@noerw noerw added the type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first. label Jan 18, 2021
@techknowlogick
Copy link
Member

For hosting repos not on the users current instance we have issues open about federation this would be our desired approach.

@6543
Copy link
Member

6543 commented Jan 18, 2021

just a side note ... if you look on a repo at "Git Center" it download the whole thing ...

@Kreyren
so it's not a decentralized file storing in that sence ... and there is a consensus to adopt ForgeFed (#14186, ...) at some point ...

@Kreyren
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kreyren commented Jan 18, 2021

Why not implementing or at least tracking this interpretation as well? Could be configurable thing

@6543
Copy link
Member

6543 commented Jan 18, 2021

1.4k issues ...

@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 11, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@techknowlogick @noerw @Kreyren @6543