You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I don't see any transformations/augmentations listed in the CDFM paper, however ZooplanktoNet achieves higher classification with performance with the following augmentations:
• rotation: random with angle from 0◦ to 360◦ with 90◦
increments
• translation: random with shift −40 or 40 piexls in
horizontal and vertical direction
• rescaling: random with scale factor between 1/1.2 and
1.2
• shearing: random with angle between −20◦ and 20◦
• flipping: random in horizontal direction or vertical direction
We could cover all of these except flipping with torchvision.transforms.RandomAffine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't see any transformations/augmentations listed in the CDFM paper, however ZooplanktoNet achieves higher classification with performance with the following augmentations:
• rotation: random with angle from 0◦ to 360◦ with 90◦
increments
• translation: random with shift −40 or 40 piexls in
horizontal and vertical direction
• rescaling: random with scale factor between 1/1.2 and
1.2
• shearing: random with angle between −20◦ and 20◦
• flipping: random in horizontal direction or vertical direction
We could cover all of these except flipping with torchvision.transforms.RandomAffine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: