Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

export annotation on a specific record to web annotation format #4

Open
jhpoelen opened this issue Nov 27, 2023 · 9 comments
Open

export annotation on a specific record to web annotation format #4

jhpoelen opened this issue Nov 27, 2023 · 9 comments

Comments

@jhpoelen
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@Filipi-Soares
Copy link

Hey folks.
I've been thinking about what we talked yesterday. If we go on that direction of representing the interactions as web annotations, maybe a model like this could work:

{
"@context": "http://www.w3.org/ns/anno.jsonld",
"id": "http://example.org/annotation123",
"type": "Annotation",
"motivatedBy": "interaction",
"target": {
"id": "http://example.org/plant123",
"type": "Plant",
"label": "Plant Species Name"
},
"body": {
"id": "http://example.org/animal123",
"type": "Animal",
"label": "Animal Species Name"
},
"relationship": "visited flower of",
"created": "2023-11-28T12:00:00Z",
"generator": {
"id": "http://example.org/researcher123",
"type": "Person",
"name": "Researcher Name"
},
"time": "2023-11-28T11:30:00Z",
"location": "Geolocation Data"
}

@Filipi-Soares
Copy link

The IDs could be hashes @jhpoelen @zedomel

@Filipi-Soares
Copy link

Filipi-Soares commented Nov 28, 2023 •
edited
Loading

'created' is the date when the interaction was recorded on the system; 'time' and 'location' refer to the interaction itself.

@zedomel
Copy link
Member

zedomel commented Nov 28, 2023

@Filipi-Soares can we use RDF triple like that one:

@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>.
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#>.
@prefix dwc: <http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/>.
@prefix ro:  <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/>.

<http://rebipp.org.br/occ/REBIPP:OCC:00101>
   a dwc:Occurrence;
   ro:RO_0002623 <http://rebipp.org.br/occ/REBIPP:OCC:00102>.

Here a complete example in turtle using PPI vocab and Darwin Core Semantic Web (DwC-SW):

@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>.
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#>.
@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/>.
@prefix dwc: <http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/>.
@prefix dwciri: <http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/iri/>.
@prefix dsw: <http://purl.org/dsw/>.
@prefix ro:  <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/>.

<http://rebipp.org.br/event/REBIPP:PPI:00001>
    a dwc:Event;
    dwc:eventDate "2000-01-05"^^xsd:dateTime;
    dwc:eventTime "-86.298055"^^xsd:dateTime;
    dsw:locatedAt <http://rebipp.org.br/location/REBIPP:LOC:0001>;
    dcterms:relation <http://rebipp.org.br/mof/REBIPP:MOF:0001>.

<http://rebipp.org.br/location/REBIPP:LOC:0001>
    a dcterms:Location;
    dwc:decimalLatitude "-47.0680352"^^xsd:decimal;
    dwc:decimalLongitude "-22.8261888"^^xsd:decimal;
    dwc:geodeticDatum "EPSG:4326";
    dwc:country "Brazil";
    dwciri:inDescribedPlace <https://sws.geonames.org/9257717>.

<http://rebipp.org.br/organism/REBIPP:IND:00001>
    a dwc:Organism;
    dsw:hasOccurrence <http://rebipp.org.br/occ/REBIPP:OCC:00101>;
    dsw:hasIdentification <http://rebipp.org.br/id/REBIPP:ID:0001>.

<http://rebipp.org.br/organism/REBIPP:IND:00002>
    a dwc:Organism;
    dsw:hasOccurrence <http://rebipp.org.br/occ/REBIPP:OCC:00102>;
    dsw:hasIdentification <http://rebipp.org.br/id/REBIPP:ID:0002>.

<http://rebipp.org.br/occ/REBIPP:OCC:00101>
   a dwc:Occurrence;
   dsw:atEvent <http://rebipp.org.br/event/REBIPP:PPI:00001>;
   dcterms:relation <http://rebipp.org.br/mof/REBIPP:MOF:0002>;
   dcterms:relation <http://rebipp.org.br/mof/REBIPP:MOF:0003>;
   ro:RO_0002623 <http://rebipp.org.br/occ/REBIPP:OCC:00102>.

<http://rebipp.org.br/occ/REBIPP:OCC:00102>
   a dwc:Occurrence;
   dsw:atEvent <http://rebipp.org.br/event/REBIPP:PPI:00001>;
   dcterms:relation <http://rebipp.org.br/mof/REBIPP:MOF:0004>;
   ro:RO_0002622 <http://rebipp.org.br/occ/REBIPP:OCC:00101>.

<http://rebipp.org.br/id/REBIPP:ID:0001>
   a dwc:Identification;
   dwciri:toTaxon <https://www.gbif.org/species/5293403>.

<http://rebipp.org.br/id/REBIPP:ID:0002>
   a dwc:Identification;
   dwciri:toTaxon <https://www.gbif.org/species/1341976>.

<http://rebipp.org.br/mof/REBIPP:MOF:0001>
   a dwc:MeasurementOrFact;
   dwciri:measurementType <http://rs.rebipp.org.br/ppi/terms/resourceCollected>;
   dwc:measurementType "resourceCollected"^^xsd:string;
   dwc:measurementValue "pollen"^^xsd:string.

<http://rebipp.org.br/mof/REBIPP:MOF:0002>
   a dwc:MeasurementOrFact;
   dwciri:measurementType <http://rs.rebipp.org.br/ppi/terms/habit>;
   dwc:measurementType "habit"^^xsd:string;
   dwciri:measurementValue <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/FLOPO_0900033>;
   dwc:measurementValue "whole plant arborescent"^^xsd:string.

<http://rebipp.org.br/mof/REBIPP:MOF:0003>
   a dwc:MeasurementOrFact;
   dwciri:measurementType <http://rs.rebipp.org.br/ppi/terms/flowerLongevity>;
   dwc:measurementType "flowerLongevity"^^xsd:string;
   dwc:measurementValue "168"^^xsd:decimal.

<http://rebipp.org.br/mof/REBIPP:MOF:0004>
   a dwc:MeasurementOrFact;
   dwciri:measurementType <http://rs.rebipp.org.br/ppi/caste>;
   dwc:measurementType "caste"^^xsd:string;
   dwc:measurementValue "worker"^^xsd:string.

@Filipi-Soares
Copy link

@zedomel this model in RDF is much more expressive, I like it a lot. The direction of the interaction is given in the set of attributes of each occurrence by RO properties, just make sense!

@jhpoelen
Copy link
Member Author

jhpoelen commented Nov 28, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Nice! Please also compare with the model recently used by @tkuhn in globalbioticinteractions/globalbioticinteractions#923 (comment) .

Would be nice to at least have a conversation around this, especially as this may build a bridge to publishers like Pensoft @lyubomirpenev and IOS Press via https://knowledgepixels.com

@Filipi-Soares
Copy link

@jhpoelen @zedomel I was wondering if we should do a test on this whole data transformation process with one dataset... We could take Carvalheiro dataset, @jhpoelen could generate all the necessary hashes, and I can use RDF Lib or OpenRefine to generate the RDF file based on this model @zedomel presented. What do you think?

@jhpoelen
Copy link
Member Author

jhpoelen commented Dec 2, 2023

@Filipi-Soares I much like to idea of experimenting with packaging of original data, their derived data products, and a description of how they are connected.

Can you please be more specific about your idea? What are the workflow steps you have in mind? What would the derived products look like? How'd you cite the data package?

Thanks for being patient with me as I am trying to understand your idea.

@Filipi-Soares
Copy link

Hey @jhpoelen :)
It is me who should be thanking you for your patience, I have difficulties writing down my ideas 😳
So, regarding the Data package citation, I think we should add a property (metadata_id) in this model Salim presented to connect the data to its metadata record. We should include the data citation in the metadata, what do you think? IDK if it works, but we can talk more about it.

About the workflow, my initial thought was to take the datasets, upload them to Globi, generate the hashes for the animal occurrence, plant occurrence, event, and any other data points that need an ID; and then, back to the spreadsheet, add these hashes as the IDs for these things. With everything filled out, I can convert these sheets to RDF. Anyway, I don't know if it is possible to implement this, so maybe we can talk more about it at our meeting on Monday?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@jhpoelen @zedomel @Filipi-Soares