Skip to content

Commit dcf6b38

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request #317 from github/0.29.0.gfm.10
0.29.0.gfm.10
2 parents 07a66c9 + bdabba4 commit dcf6b38

File tree

2 files changed

+23
-1
lines changed

2 files changed

+23
-1
lines changed

CMakeLists.txt

+1-1
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ project(cmark-gfm)
44
set(PROJECT_VERSION_MAJOR 0)
55
set(PROJECT_VERSION_MINOR 29)
66
set(PROJECT_VERSION_PATCH 0)
7-
set(PROJECT_VERSION_GFM 6)
7+
set(PROJECT_VERSION_GFM 10)
88
set(PROJECT_VERSION ${PROJECT_VERSION_MAJOR}.${PROJECT_VERSION_MINOR}.${PROJECT_VERSION_PATCH}.gfm.${PROJECT_VERSION_GFM})
99

1010
include("FindAsan.cmake")

changelog.txt

+22
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,3 +1,25 @@
1+
[0.29.0.gfm.10]
2+
3+
* Fixed polynomial time complexity issue per
4+
https://github.com/github/cmark-gfm/security/advisories/GHSA-r8vr-c48j-fcc5
5+
* Fixed polynomial time complexity issues per
6+
https://github.com/github/cmark-gfm/security/advisories/GHSA-66g8-4hjf-77xh
7+
8+
Note: these changes remove redundant bold tag nesting which may result
9+
in existing rendering tests failing, e.g. rendering "____bold____" to html
10+
will no longer yield "<p><strong><strong>bold</strong></strong></p>".
11+
12+
[0.29.0.gfm.9]
13+
14+
* Cleanup: Use of a private header was cleaned up (#248)
15+
* Cleanup: Man page was updated (#255)
16+
* Cleanup: Warnings for -Wstrict-prototypes were cleaned up (#285)
17+
* Cleanup: We avoid header duplication (#289)
18+
19+
* We now store positioning info for url_match (#201)
20+
* We now expose cmark_parent_footnote_def for non-C renderers (#254)
21+
* Footnote aria-label text now reference the specific footnote backref, and we include a data-footnote-backref-idx attribute so the label can be internationalized in a downstream filter (#307)
22+
123
[0.29.0.gfm.8]
224

325
* We restored backwards compatibility by deprecating the `cmark_init_standard_node_flags()` requirement, which is now a noop (#305)

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)