feat: Add new Protocol for DebugImages and AddressMode

[Swatinem]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

	Fails
🚫	Please consider adding a changelog entry for the next release.

	Messages
📖	Do not forget to update Sentry-docs with your feature once the pull request gets approved.

Instructions and example for changelog

Please add an entry to CHANGELOG.md to the "Unreleased" section. Make sure the entry includes this PR's number.

Example:

- Add new Protocol for DebugImages and AddressMode ([#1513](https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-dotnet/pull/1513))

If none of the above apply, you can opt out of this check by adding #skip-changelog to the PR description.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against f589af9

[bruno-garcia]

@SimonCropp is this PR just missing the verify snapshots?
@Swatinem is from the native team, could you please give him a hand?

[SimonCropp]

@Swatinem sorry for the hassle. You can read about Verify here https://github.com/VerifyTests/Verify

For now i have accepted the changes in the pending snaphots.

those api changes are configured to autoverify. so if you run all the tests, you should notice those files being updated in your git tooling.

As for getting you setup and more familiar with snapshot testing. lets chat on discord

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1513 (122fac6) into main (7604242) will decrease coverage by 0.47%.
The diff coverage is 14.58%.

❗ Current head 122fac6 differs from pull request most recent head aacc33d. Consider uploading reports for the commit aacc33d to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1513      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.34%   83.87%   -0.48%     
==========================================
  Files         219      220       +1     
  Lines        7423     7435      +12     
  Branches     1417     1426       +9     
==========================================
- Hits         6261     6236      -25     
- Misses        735      764      +29     
- Partials      427      435       +8     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/Sentry/DebugImage.cs	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/Sentry/SentryEvent.cs	90.62% <33.33%> (-4.34%)	⬇️
src/Sentry/Exceptions/SentryStackFrame.cs	77.89% <80.00%> (+0.97%)	⬆️
...als/DiagnosticSource/SentryDiagnosticSubscriber.cs	88.00% <0.00%> (-7.46%)	⬇️
src/Sentry/Internal/Http/RetryAfterHandler.cs	95.83% <0.00%> (-4.17%)	⬇️
...Internals/DiagnosticSource/SentryEFCoreListener.cs	89.28% <0.00%> (-3.74%)	⬇️
src/Sentry/Internal/Http/CachingTransport.cs	79.31% <0.00%> (-2.64%)	⬇️
src/Sentry/Internal/BackgroundWorker.cs	92.02% <0.00%> (-1.45%)	⬇️
...ce/Internals/DiagnosticSource/SentrySqlListener.cs	81.69% <0.00%> (-1.44%)	⬇️
src/Sentry/Internal/MemoryInfo.cs	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 8 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 982f223...aacc33d. Read the comment docs.

[Swatinem]

[xUnit.net 00:00:17.03]     Sentry.Tests.TaskUnobservedTaskExceptionIntegrationTests.Handle_UnobservedTaskException_CaptureEvent [FAIL]
Error: Assert.True() Failure
Expected: True
Actual:   False
  Failed Sentry.Tests.TaskUnobservedTaskExceptionIntegrationTests.Handle_UnobservedTaskException_CaptureEvent [4 s]
  Error Message:
   Assert.True() Failure
Expected: True
Actual:   False
  Stack Trace:
    at Sentry.Tests.TaskUnobservedTaskExceptionIntegrationTests.Handle_UnobservedTaskException_CaptureEvent () [0x000c2] in <0cb8deca1ea949418add5fbe2e94325a>:0 
  at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.Reflection.RuntimeMethodInfo.InternalInvoke(System.Reflection.RuntimeMethodInfo,object,object[],System.Exception&)
  at System.Reflection.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke (System.Object obj, System.Reflection.BindingFlags invokeAttr, System.Reflection.Binder binder, System.Object[] parameters, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture) [0x0006a] in <533173d24dae460899d2b10975534bb0>:0 

Seems flaky? It used to pass before the merge.

[bruno-garcia]

It was once before so might be again: #743