-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Are we using the correct DEM ? #552
Comments
|
Hi @yunjunz , that is what it says, but in my example above it does not. There is no difference whether I use the |
Thank you. That looks different to what I have. So I really have an installation problem with PROJ_LIB. |
Summary: the DEM created using the
sardem
code (Copernicus DEM) has elevation referenced to the geoid. In the past we useddem.py
which produced a DEM with elevation referenced to the ellipsoid. I thought that this what we need to use, but thesardem
DEM makes me wonder. Alternatively, there could be a problem with oursardem/gdal
installation.sardem
uses the local gdal installation (PROJ_LIB
) for height conversion. I previously got errors regardingPROJ_LIB
which somehow I made disappear. I have not yet been able to test independently that our gdal installation works. Actually some tests proposal by copilot rather suggest that it does not work, which would be the explanation.In the past we did:
It created two DEMs, which are shown below. We always used the
*dem.wgs84
file where sea level gets negative.Here the
sardem
command:It does not produce and negative elevations which surprises me.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: