Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix for failure for reasoner to update after undo #114

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2017
Merged

Fix for failure for reasoner to update after undo #114

merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2017

Conversation

balhoff
Copy link
Member

@balhoff balhoff commented May 30, 2017

No description provided.

@kltm
Copy link
Member

kltm commented May 30, 2017

@balhoff Assuming @cmungall accepts the PR, do you feel comfortable with this fix going in hot just before the meeting?

@balhoff
Copy link
Member Author

balhoff commented May 30, 2017

The existing unit tests pass but it may be a little risky without some more interactive testing. Depends how much the bad reasoner experience with undo/redo is impacting people. I would say there's very little chance for breakage except for one thing: this will now mark the ModelContainer as 'modified' after an undo, which wasn't happening before. That itself may have been the source of some odd behavior.

@kltm
Copy link
Member

kltm commented May 30, 2017

As the current undo/redo-reasoner combo pretty much breaks the system, likely anything would be better, but depending on how the code is setup, I could imagine there could be risks. I'm just wondering if you would feel more comfortable to wait a week or if you think that we can test as we go during the workshop. Worst case is we revert, but if there is a possibility of something leaking out...

@kltm
Copy link
Member

kltm commented May 30, 2017

It sounds like you're pretty confident though. I think then that if Chris is okay, I'll go ahead an pout it out during the next quiet time.

Copy link
Member

@cmungall cmungall left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I haven't looked but agree with Seth

@balhoff
Copy link
Member Author

balhoff commented May 30, 2017

Go for it.

@kltm kltm merged commit 7bf0f4d into master May 31, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants