Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reproduce Table 3 #12

Closed
sigeisler opened this issue Dec 11, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Reproduce Table 3 #12

sigeisler opened this issue Dec 11, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@sigeisler
Copy link

Hi,

First, I want to thank you to provide your code despite the migration from your internal codebase.

I am wondering what I need to do to reproduce the state-of-the-art results in Table 3. Either I missed sth or you do not explain this in your readme.

It would be awesome if you could give some pointer and maybe even provide a pre-trained model.

Thanks,
Simon

@jackroos
Copy link
Member

Hi @sigeisler

Thanks for your interest. Due to the platform switch, the previous pre-trained models could not be used in this codebase, we may train some larger models (e.g., ResNet 101) and release them in the future. But for now, you should train them by yourself. For ResNet 101, you could simply add the '--backbone resnet101' argument in this config file. For ResNeXt and DCN, we don't support them now in this codebase, you should modify the backbone file by yourself. Thank you!

@sigeisler
Copy link
Author

Hi @jackroos

thank you very much! Brief follow-up question. I noticed that in contrast to DETR you increased the number of object queries from 100 to 300. How much is the performance boost of doing that? Was there any specific reason why you increased this?

@mordechail
Copy link

Hi,

ResNet 101/ResNeXt models will be released soon?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants