You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
An output that specifies how many matches were found would make the action useful for scenarios outside of feedback in pull requests. For example, the number of occurrences of a pattern could be tracked as a kind of code quality metric:
While the above supposes the existence of an output like total-matches, a more flexible output could be accomplished by extending the input patterns.pattern with an id, like:
I like the id idea. I don't see why we couldn't set individual outputs, like steps.grep.outputs.fixme.count either. The dorny/paths-filter action seems able to output dyamic things like steps.changes.outputs.{my-filter-name}, so this would be similar to that.
That's a good point about dorny/paths-filter. For some reason I assumed there would be a lot of frustrating pitfalls in using outputs without fixed names, such that it would be more trouble than it's worth. I haven't found that to be the case with that particular action.
An output that specifies how many matches were found would make the action useful for scenarios outside of feedback in pull requests. For example, the number of occurrences of a pattern could be tracked as a kind of code quality metric:
While the above supposes the existence of an output like
total-matches
, a more flexible output could be accomplished by extending the inputpatterns.pattern
with anid
, like:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: