You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In many cases we have barriers for which we can't set the type of access due to the lack of the ground true evidence. And even for the highways that are inside the area guarded by barriers we can't set the type of access. In this situations we kind of know that the routing through that area should not happen but we can't edit the map without evidence (signs etc. ). This situations leads to allow routing in many similar areas as described. Many cases could be resolved by adding a penalty when having a barrier. It's obvious that when cars are waiting at a barrier there is time consumption and this time should be taken in consideration when routing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
So what would be the best approach to penalise this barriers? The barriers are there, it take time from the routing path it has to be someway to be taking in consideration when computing the path. Thank you!
In many cases we have barriers for which we can't set the type of access due to the lack of the ground true evidence. And even for the highways that are inside the area guarded by barriers we can't set the type of access. In this situations we kind of know that the routing through that area should not happen but we can't edit the map without evidence (signs etc. ). This situations leads to allow routing in many similar areas as described. Many cases could be resolved by adding a penalty when having a barrier. It's obvious that when cars are waiting at a barrier there is time consumption and this time should be taken in consideration when routing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: