From 378052ab6f0e3fff3b047d635b043d4921029092 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Folkert <folkert@folkertdev.nl>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 13:30:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] this test was added in
 https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/105193

but actually NO_COVERAGE is no longer a thing in the compiler. Sadly,
the link to the issue is broken, so I don't know what the problem was
originally, but I don't think this is relevant any more with the global
asm approach
---
 tests/codegen/naked-fn/naked-nocoverage.rs | 19 -------------------
 1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 tests/codegen/naked-fn/naked-nocoverage.rs

diff --git a/tests/codegen/naked-fn/naked-nocoverage.rs b/tests/codegen/naked-fn/naked-nocoverage.rs
deleted file mode 100644
index d73c5b7fd26d1..0000000000000
--- a/tests/codegen/naked-fn/naked-nocoverage.rs
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
-// Checks that naked functions are not instrumented by -Cinstrument-coverage.
-// Regression test for issue #105170.
-//
-//@ needs-asm-support
-//@ compile-flags: -Zno-profiler-runtime
-//@ compile-flags: -Cinstrument-coverage
-#![crate_type = "lib"]
-#![feature(naked_functions)]
-use std::arch::asm;
-
-#[naked]
-#[no_mangle]
-pub unsafe extern "C" fn f() {
-    // CHECK:       define {{(dso_local )?}}void @f()
-    // CHECK-NEXT:  start:
-    // CHECK-NEXT:    call void asm
-    // CHECK-NEXT:    unreachable
-    asm!("", options(noreturn));
-}