You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for sharing the code. I wonder the detail of obtaining the first (ResNet) model for the first 10 classes in CIFAR100. I tried to reimplement your code with Pytorch. However, even at the first step, the performance is only 85% (averaged on many random splits, with your augmentation strategy), but yours is nearly 90%. It is said that the first model is trained using ResNet-Matconvnet. Do you used any pretrained model (by finetuning) when train the first model?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
By the way, in the Fig. 4, it is interesting that, at the first step, all models w./w.o. data augmentation, achieved nearly the same performance. Does it mean that data augmentation does not contribute to the training of the first model?
Thank you for sharing the code. I wonder the detail of obtaining the first (ResNet) model for the first 10 classes in CIFAR100. I tried to reimplement your code with Pytorch. However, even at the first step, the performance is only 85% (averaged on many random splits, with your augmentation strategy), but yours is nearly 90%. It is said that the first model is trained using ResNet-Matconvnet. Do you used any pretrained model (by finetuning) when train the first model?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: