Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

USFS_Deep_Fuel_Beds #14116

Open
drjfloyd opened this issue Jan 24, 2025 · 7 comments
Open

USFS_Deep_Fuel_Beds #14116

drjfloyd opened this issue Jan 24, 2025 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@drjfloyd
Copy link
Contributor

Running with FDS-6.9.1-1713-g97976da-HEAD.

The following cases die with a segfualt or a CFACE error before the first timestep:

burn138_120D_30S_35L
burn137_120D_30S_35L
burn136_120D_30S_35L
burn126_120D_21S_35L
burn125_120D_21S_35L
burn124_120D_21S_35L
burn123_120D_18S_35L
burn122_120D_18S_35L
burn121_120D_18S_35L
burn120_120D_18S_35L
burn118_120D_18S_35L
burn117_30D_30S_25L
burn116_30D_30S_25L
burn112_60D_30S_35L
burn111_60D_30S_35L
burn110_60D_30S_35L
burn114_120D_18S_35L
burn113_60D_33S_35L
burn104_60D_21S_35L
burn103_60D_18S_35L
burn102_60D_18S_35L
burn91_120D_18S_35L
burn89_120D_21S_40L
burn88_120D_33S_45L
burn86_120D_33S_45L
burn85_120D_30S_45L
burn84_120D_30S_45L
burn79_120D_18S_40L
burn78_120D_21S_40L
burn43_60D_30S_30L
burn77_120D_21S_40L
burn76_120D_21S_40L
burn71_120D_18S_35L
burn72_120D_21S_35L
burn69_120D_21S_35L
burn58_30D_18S_20L
burn49_60D_18S_25L
burn40_60D_18S_30L
burn48_60D_21S_25L
burn36_30D_39S_30L
burn34_30D_33S_30L
burn35_120D_33S_30L

@marcosvanella marcosvanella self-assigned this Jan 24, 2025
@marcosvanella
Copy link
Contributor

Provably a recent change in GET_CFACE_GSVARS. I'll take a look.

@rmcdermo
Copy link
Contributor

@marcosvanella These cases seem to be a good bellwether of geom changes. Perhaps we should take one and add it to Complex_Geometry verification cases and just run for a very short time.

@marcosvanella
Copy link
Contributor

Good idea. We've done something that broke the cut-cell region definition when refinement is present.

@marcosvanella
Copy link
Contributor

Jason do an update and try these cases again. Thanks.

@drjfloyd
Copy link
Contributor Author

drjfloyd commented Feb 1, 2025

I goofed and started rerunning the lattimer case that failed instead of these cases. Will start one of the up.

@drjfloyd
Copy link
Contributor Author

drjfloyd commented Feb 1, 2025

It is timestepping now.

@marcosvanella
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks Jason, I reproduced the instability in the Lattimer case. I'll look at it today.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants