Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Standard WG Meeting - February 24, 2022 #597

Closed
15 tasks done
Julia-Ritter opened this issue Feb 18, 2022 · 24 comments
Closed
15 tasks done

Standard WG Meeting - February 24, 2022 #597

Julia-Ritter opened this issue Feb 18, 2022 · 24 comments
Labels
indexed When a meeting attendance is being tracked meeting Standard WG Meeting

Comments

@Julia-Ritter
Copy link
Contributor

Julia-Ritter commented Feb 18, 2022 •
edited by kriswest
Loading

Date

Thursday 24 FEB 2022 - 10am EST / 3pm GMT

WebEx info

More ways to join

  • Join by video system:
  • Join by phone
    • +1-415-655-0003 US Toll
    • +44-20319-88141 UK Toll
  • Access code: 665 568 411

Meeting notices

  • FINOS Project leads are responsible for observing the FINOS guidelines for running project meetings. Project maintainers can find additional resources in the FINOS Maintainers Cheatsheet.

  • All participants in FINOS project meetings are subject to the LF Antitrust Policy, the FINOS Community Code of Conduct and all other FINOS policies.

  • FINOS meetings involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the intention of FINOS and the Linux Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in, any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws. Please contact legal@finos.org with any questions.

  • FINOS project meetings may be recorded for use solely by the FINOS team for administration purposes. In very limited instances, and with explicit approval, recordings may be made more widely available.

Agenda

Minutes

  • Review action items from previous meeting

    • All action items from Jan 27 SWG completed except last PR review for CFT discussion group PRs

  • Proposal to appoint Editor: Hugh Troeger (@greyseer256)

    • @kriswest highlighted the participant/editor/maintainer roles described in the README and briefly described the editor role
    • @donbasuno proposed Hugh Troeger, a software engineer at FactSet, as Editor
    • @greyseer256 briefly introduced himself
    • @kriswest described his interactions to date with HT on recent PRs
    • @greyseer256 appointment as Editor was approved by silent consensus

  • Proposal from Content Data & Intents discussion group: Add ViewHoldings intent #541

    • @kriswest explained that this is the first of several planned propsals from the group and directs the SWG to the relevant issues in GitHub
    • @kriswest briefly outlined the ViewHoldings intent
    • @lspiro-Tick42 commented that listing intents as part of the FDC3 standard may not be productive, but did not have an objection to this intent specifically. @kriswest advised @lspiro-Tick42 to raise as a comment to the discussion group. @lspiro-Tick42 agreed to raise with the discussion group.
    • Add ViewHoldings intent #541 was approved by silent consensus

  • FDC3 Conformance Testing Project

    • @nicopreto outlined that ScottLogic are starting a project to provide a framework to confirm that DesktopAgent implementations provide complete and conformant implementations of the FDC3 standard
    • @ColinEberhardt highlighted that their intention is to work in the open and contributed it via PR into the FDC3 project
    • @lspiro-Tick42 suggested that CE/NP may want to use the Glue42 open source FDC3 implementation for testing
    • @nicopreto requested help from anyone who may be interested
    • @kriswest highlighted that the project will target FDC3 1.2 at present and move on to 2.0 as the specification becomes clearer

  • Voting on the future of the AppDirectory as part of FDC3: Remove the Application Directory from The FDC3 Specification #551

    • @kriswest: There have been a number of opportunities for participants to provide their opinions on issue Remove the Application Directory from The FDC3 Specification #551, which seeks to remove the App Directory from the FDC3 standard, both through the Standards Working Group meetings and the AppD discussion group recently set-up.
      These discussions have not been wholly productive and it is the consensus of the FDC3 maintainers that we should move to a vote on the issue, in order to gauge the consensus of the community on the issue and to allow us to move on.
      We propose to open the vote to enrolled "participants" in FDC3, who can cast their votes by sending an email to fdc3-participants@finos.org.
      This is the same procedure used to vote on adoption of Standard versions and will be used to approve the final pre-draft of FDC3 2.0
    • If you have not yet enrolled as a voting participant you can do so by visiting the FDC3 readme on Github and clicking on the link in the enrollment section of the FDC3 README.
    • If you have any doubts about whether you are able to enroll as a voting participant please contact the FDC3 maintainers on fdc3-maintainers@finos.org or FINOS directly who can help you work that out.
    • We intend to allow some time for active participants that have not yet enrolled to do so. Hence, we'll announce dates and procedures for the vote via email (and on the relevant issue) in due course.
    • @kriswest confirmed that there can be multiple members per organisation and that decisions are made on the basis of consensus of the participants.
    • For more details on decision making in FDC3 see the Governance document

  • Proposal: Require propagation of originating application identity on context/intent handlers Require propagation of originating application identity on context/intent handlers #520

    • @bertrand-s gave high level description of the proposal
    • @dimiter-georgiev explained that without this any intent being raised to send a message via Symphony would require a pop-up asking for user confirmation
    • @kriswest signposted the SWG to the discussion in GitHub and asked for comments to go there: Support propagation of originating application identity #569
    • A meeting participant asked whether this information could be spoofed
    • @kriswest described how the proposed implementation may help prevent spoofing (by requiring a Desktop Agent implementation to supply the information to a context or intent listener)
    • @openfin-johans asked if there is a specific discussion group for this proposal
      • @kriswest Not currently, I suggest we work on the discussion for now and then if the issue can't be decided at our next meeting, split of a discussion group to work on a proposal
    • @MichaelMCoates commented that on first glance he thought it shouldn't be a "MUST" implement for the standard and would comment on the GitHub discussion
    • Some discussion ensued covering the advantages/disadvantages of the proposal, whether it would be mandatory or optional and some options for technical implementation
    • @kriswest confirmed that this would be added to the agenda for the next SWG and offered to summarize some of the points made and possible ways forward on the discussion Support propagation of originating application identity #569

  • AOB

    • There were no additional items raised

Decisions Made

Action Items

Untracked attendees

Full name Affiliation GitHub username
@kriswest kriswest changed the title Standard WG Meeting - FEB 24, 2022 Standard WG Meeting - February 24, 2022 Feb 21, 2022
@ColinEberhardt
Copy link
Contributor

Colin E (Scott Logic)

@mattjamieson
Copy link
Contributor

👋

@tpina
Copy link
Contributor

tpina commented Feb 24, 2022

Tiago Pina / Cosaic

@kriswest
Copy link
Contributor

Kris West / Cosaic

@dschleifer
Copy link

Dan Schleifer (Cosaic)

@pauldyson
Copy link
Contributor

Paul Dyson (Singletrack)

@hughtroeger
Copy link
Contributor

Hugh Troeger / FactSet

@nicopreto
Copy link

Nico Pretorius (Scott Logic)

@openfin-johans
Copy link
Contributor

Johan / OpenFin 🎁

@lspiro-Tick42
Copy link

Leslie - Glue42

@jgavronsky
Copy link

Jane @ FINOS here

@dbutt-scottlogic
Copy link

David Butt / Scott Logic

@WatsonCIQ
Copy link
Contributor

Chris Watson / Cosaic

@Qiana-Citi
Copy link

Qiana / Citi

@bertrand-s
Copy link
Contributor

Bertrand / Symphony

@openfin-gavin
Copy link

Gavin Lauchlan | OpenFin

@AidanZealley
Copy link

Aidan Zealley / Scott Logic

@timjenkel
Copy link

Tim Jenkel / Wellington

@pierreneu
Copy link

Pierre Neu / Symphony

@sarahaislinnstone
Copy link

Sarah Stone / Cosaic

@agitana
Copy link
Member

agitana commented Feb 24, 2022

Aitana Myohl / FINOS

@dimiter-georgiev
Copy link

Dimiter Georgiev / Symphony

@Julia-Ritter
Copy link
Contributor Author

Julia / FINOS

@MichaelMCoates
Copy link

Michael Coates / OpenFin

@kriswest kriswest mentioned this issue Mar 24, 2022
Closed
13 tasks
@github-actions github-actions bot added the indexed When a meeting attendance is being tracked label Mar 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
indexed When a meeting attendance is being tracked meeting Standard WG Meeting
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests