Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question: Is 3945ms of additional load time from this plugin normal? #454

Closed
flyinbutrs opened this issue Nov 2, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed
Labels
performance Issues with the package's speed or CPU usage, including startup time. question Help requests and general enquiries from users.

Comments

@flyinbutrs
Copy link

I'm going through my package list, trying to figure out what is making Atom so slow to start for me, and I see this plugin is adding 3945ms:

image

Is that normal? If so, can anything be done to speed it up? If not, any ideas on how I can debug this?

@flyinbutrs
Copy link
Author

Just read the task list on #359, I suspect increasing load time is on the to-do. If the above is totally normal, I can just close this.

@Alhadis
Copy link
Member

Alhadis commented Nov 2, 2016

Hey there,

Does this happen on reboot? Double-check that you're not running in development mode or anything.

There's no way it should be taking that long.

@Alhadis
Copy link
Member

Alhadis commented Nov 2, 2016

Average load time for v2 is ~35-45ms, BTW.

@Alhadis Alhadis added the waiting Feedback pending from reporter, or waiting for an upstream release to land. label Nov 3, 2016
@Alhadis
Copy link
Member

Alhadis commented Nov 13, 2016

@flyinbutrs Any feedback? Is this still happening?

@flyinbutrs
Copy link
Author

flyinbutrs commented Nov 15, 2016

After a reboot, it's a much more reasonable 171ms. I'm also still on 1.7.25 though. Is v2 out?

@Alhadis
Copy link
Member

Alhadis commented Nov 15, 2016

Ah no, not yet. Still about 45-50% through, but it's going well. I've made it a mission to release V2 before Christmas, though, hahaha. I opened a project board-thingie for it.

Glad to hear the speed was only a temporary issue. :-) Ping me again if you see anything unusual.

@Alhadis Alhadis closed this as completed Nov 15, 2016
@Alhadis Alhadis added question Help requests and general enquiries from users. performance Issues with the package's speed or CPU usage, including startup time. and removed waiting Feedback pending from reporter, or waiting for an upstream release to land. labels Oct 15, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
performance Issues with the package's speed or CPU usage, including startup time. question Help requests and general enquiries from users.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants