Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

types(jest-haste-map): Expose a minimal public API to TypeScript #13023

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 10, 2022

Conversation

robhogan
Copy link
Contributor

@robhogan robhogan commented Jul 13, 2022

Summary

Currently, jest-haste-map exposes a large API surface, most of which is unused by Jest and none(?) of which is documented. Some of this is a legacy of internal FB usage.

This is a conservative type-only change to minimally define the interfaces actually used by Jest itself. It's intended to be particularly useful to users of hasteMapModulePath, to reduce and clarify the API they're required to implement, and at Meta it will help us flag uses of APIs Jest doesn't need.

(This also paves the way for upstreaming some of the work we're doing/intend to do on metro-file-map (context: facebook/metro#812) to extract and decouple some Meta-specific stuff)

Test plan

No runtime changes, TS build passes.

@Biki-das
Copy link
Contributor

Biki-das commented Sep 9, 2022

oops!😅 solving the same wheel closing mine @robhogan ?

@SimenB
Copy link
Member

SimenB commented Sep 10, 2022

@robhogan sorry, missed this one! feel free to ping me, I'm always up for reviewing PRs from Meta peeps 🙂

I merged in main and resolved the conflicts, so let's see what CI says 👍

Copy link
Member

@SimenB SimenB left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just some q's, the changes generally LGTM.

could you add a changelog entry as well?

import Runtime from 'jest-runtime';

export default function createContext(
config: Config.ProjectConfig,
{hasteFS, moduleMap}: HasteMapObject,
{hasteFS, moduleMap}: {hasteFS: IHasteFS; moduleMap: IModuleMap},
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why do we have an inline type here instead of using a named one?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I mostly meant, why is this HasteMapObject thing not exported from jest-haste-map?

@@ -109,11 +111,12 @@ type Watcher = {

type HasteWorker = typeof import('./worker');

export type {default as FS} from './HasteFS';
export {default as ModuleMap} from './ModuleMap';
export const ModuleMap = HasteModuleMap as {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why do we need to cast?

packages/jest-haste-map/src/index.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@robhogan robhogan changed the title types(jest-haste-map): Define/restrict public interfaces types(jest-haste-map): Expose a minimal public API to TypeScript Sep 10, 2022
@@ -1143,3 +1146,11 @@ function copy<T extends Record<string, unknown>>(object: T): T {
function copyMap<K, V>(input: Map<K, V>): Map<K, V> {
return new Map(input);
}

// Export the smallest API surface required by Jest
type IJestHasteMap = HasteMapStatic & {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be exported?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@robhogan robhogan Sep 10, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure to be honest. In a way it's exposed via typeof the default export. Users of hasteImplModulePath shouldn't be using it, because they only need to provide a module that implements the smaller HasteMapStatic interface (which is exported).

The general idea is to "hide" statics we don't need to be public - such as the bunch that come from extending EventEmitter.

Happy to go with your judgement anyway.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fair enough 👍 If for some reason people want it, I assume they'll send a PR 😀

Comment on lines -115 to -116
ChangeEvent,
HasteMap as HasteMapObject,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

removing these exports is a breaking change

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

specifically HasteMapObject probably - if people get a newer version of jest-haste-map than @jest/core it might cause compilation issues.

But maybe not - since we bundle our TS types, lots of internal types are never present in d.ts files - https://www.runpkg.com/?@jest/core@29.0.2/build/index.d.ts

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I think this is safe, because as you say it's not referenced by the built declaration files there should be no observable change to consumers of jest.

(It's type-breaking to users of jest-haste-map directly of course, but I'm working on the assumption that Jest semver is at a higher level.)

@robhogan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for looking at this @SimenB (but have a good weekend! 😄)

@SimenB SimenB merged commit ac57282 into jestjs:main Sep 10, 2022
@SimenB
Copy link
Member

SimenB commented Sep 10, 2022

https://github.com/facebook/jest/releases/tag/v29.0.3

@SimenB
Copy link
Member

SimenB commented Sep 10, 2022

have a good weekend! 😄

same to you! 👍

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Please note this issue tracker is not a help forum. We recommend using StackOverflow or our discord channel for questions.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 11, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants