Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add additional Containerfile/Dockerfile based on alpine #11

Open
emanuelb opened this issue Apr 6, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Add additional Containerfile/Dockerfile based on alpine #11

emanuelb opened this issue Apr 6, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@emanuelb
Copy link

emanuelb commented Apr 6, 2021

The Dockerfile used is based on debian, it would be helpful to have another one that is based on alpine.

@shesek
Copy link
Contributor

shesek commented Apr 14, 2021

I prefer not to maintain eznode on two different base images. I could consider switching entirely to alpine, but since the image is pretty large anyway (~100MB on top of the base image and expected to grow) I'm not sure there's much advantage to doing so.

Following our FB discussion on this matter, do you still see a need for this?

@emanuelb
Copy link
Author

yes, all was explained in the FB discussion (the pros: are not just less space.., there many differences between alpine & debian) anyway it's something that probably worth to consider later after most of the external components already installed (to support lightning, other features , etc...)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants