-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix gas expectations in the semantics tests #12225
Comments
Maybe related: #11600 |
It indeed also was the constructor call in my case, so maybe a duplicate - but the conditions under which it happens seem a bit fuzzy. |
Which tests was that? #11974 has a lot of them :)
|
As I said: it was the constructor for the deposit contract. Try running Which means it's not only |
Also in both cases the value is way beyond 100000. |
ok, in that case it does sound like a bug. |
Actually it's also not only |
In #11974 I noticed that the tests seem to pass no matter what
legacyOptimized
gas costs were used for the deposit contract.The expectation only got handled correctly with a value for
--enforce-gas-cost-min-value 1
inisoltest
and alsosoltest
doesn't seem to fail on wrong expectation.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: