-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 371
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Post London EIP-1559 Assessment Part II (Breakout #13) #374
Comments
I might not be able to join the call (@tvanepps is hosting), but want to share some observations using 1559 over the past few weeks. It seems like some applications pre-generate transactions for wallets to sign and set both the My intuition is that the application or the library it uses to generate transactions probably doesn't have 1559 support and sets both fields to a legacy Perhaps this is something that wallets can catch and fix? It might be a bit hacky, but something like if the On this last note, it seems like the oracles from wallets have improved over the past couple weeks :-) [0] I haven't run the numbers on this, but I suspect when >3 blocks are 100% full, it is likely a good indication we've moved from one mode to the other. |
Recording of the call https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtkU2773K6w |
Date and Time
Date/Time: Friday, Sept 10 at 14:00 UTC (10:00 ET)
Duration: 60 mins
Post-London discussion and assessment of EIP-1559 for implementers, tooling, and infrastructure providers.
Agenda
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: