Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EIPIP Meeting 91 #278

Closed
7 of 8 tasks
poojaranjan opened this issue Sep 20, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed
7 of 8 tasks

EIPIP Meeting 91 #278

poojaranjan opened this issue Sep 20, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Member

poojaranjan commented Sep 20, 2023

Date and Time

Oct 04, 2023 at 14:00 UTC

Location

Zoom: TBA in the Discord #eip-editing channel

YouTube Live Stream/Recording: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4cwHXAawZxpLrRIkDlBjDUUrGgF91pQw

Agenda

1. Discuss Open Issues/PRs, and other topics

Changes to Final proposals

Manual Merge

2. Discussion continued or updates from past meetings

3. EIPs Insight - Monthly EIPs status reporting.

4. EIP Editing Office Hour

5. Review action items from earlier meetings

6. Announcement

ERC@Devconnect

@Pandapip1
Copy link
Contributor

Could I add ethereum/EIPs#7806?

@xinbenlv
Copy link

xinbenlv commented Oct 4, 2023

Can we add EIP/ERC split update to the agenda? https://hackmd.io/A1zfRkO7RKKV6BIaSXpcbw ?

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Member Author

Summary

1. Discuss Open Issues/PRs, and other topics

ethereum/EIPs#7806

  • @Pandapip1 brought the item for discussion suggesting there isn't a process for Superseding.
  • @lightclient agreed it was a bit complicated in the past and is discontinued. And the PR should be closed.
  • PandaPip proposed if this can be allowed under "Security consideration"?
  • Matt found it generally reasonable. He also brought up the point of consideration for an author to add a status Final-Deprecated.
  • Pandpip: Final-Withdrawn
  • @xinbenlv said that Final-Superseded will be good in the context of ERCs.
  • It's worth following the discussion on the recording.

Decision

  • Panda will draft a PR to add a field "Superseded by" in the Preamble.
  • It will be discussed in the following meeting.
  • Keep the PR open.

ethereum/EIPs#7423

  • Approved by editors and merged.

Manual Merge

ethereum/EIPs#7505

  • Approved in the last meeting.
  • @lightclient wants to take another look before merging.
  • Panda (who missed the last meeting) also approved.

ethereum/EIPs#7506

  • Approved in earlier meetings.
  • Merged.

2. Discussion continued or updates from past meetings

ethereum/EIPs#7550

Call for Input

  • The due date is Oct 6th, so we have some time for editors to respond to Call for Action.
  • PandaPip brought up Call for Input: Editor Removal (@axic) #266 for discussion mentioning unavailability of an author may block decision-making. The way the current charter is set up, the involvement of every author is needed. He further proposed to have an "Intermediate Editor"?
  • agreeing to that @g11tech said getting feedback in the first week of Issues will be ideal to speed up the process.
  • Without Axic voting, there is no way to have the first "keeper of the consensus".
  • Matt and other editors are respectful of Axic's interest to continue to contribute but there were discussion of having a "special status editor" or delegate vote.
  • It seems the proposal will not pass, no decision on the call, will be communicated at the next meeting.

Repo split - EIP-7329

  • PandaPip proposed meeting time as next Oct 11th at 1400 UTC.
  • May reach out to all editors async to plan the meeting given Sam is on vacation till 17th.
  • He further shared a "last minute change" to splitting the repo wrt "EIP Type".
  • Victor: Interface may go closer to ERC. Wondering about the placeholder for Interface and similar EIPs.
  • Matt: Interface and networking to be deprecated.
  • Gajinder: EIPs requiring hardfork will be Core and rest all not with Core EIPs. Also, decided to deprecate categories.
  • Panda: will update the related Call For Input Issue.
  • Danno - The Developer audience is more important to draw the line for EIPs categories.
  • The networking group works well with the Client dev group and should be excluded from the ERC group.
  • The subdomain erc.ethereum.org is ready. Just waiting to set up the correct files.
  • Panda wants to try to separate the repo. Matt is pretty against that but open to look into the Pull Request.
  • Worth following the discussion.
    We ran out of time, the discussion will be continued on the Discord.

@poojaranjan poojaranjan mentioned this issue Oct 4, 2023
11 tasks
@poojaranjan
Copy link
Member Author

Closing in favor of #281

@poojaranjan poojaranjan mentioned this issue Oct 17, 2023
7 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants