-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
/
Copy pathecrm_231027.owl
11250 lines (10046 loc) · 733 KB
/
ecrm_231027.owl
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:ecrm="http://erlangen-crm.org/231027/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://erlangen-crm.org/231027/">
<owl:Ontology rdf:about="">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Erlangen CRM / OWL</rdfs:label>
<owl:versionInfo xml:lang="en">ECRM 231027 / CIDOC-CRM 7.1.2</owl:versionInfo>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Erlangen CRM / OWL - An OWL DL 1.0 implementation of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model, based on: Nick Crofts, Martin Doerr, Tony Gill, Stephen Stead, Matthew Stiff (eds.): Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (http://cidoc-crm.org/).
This implementation has been originally created by Bernhard Schiemann, Martin Oischinger and Günther Görz at the Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Department of Computer Science, Chair of Computer Science 8 (Artificial Intelligence) in cooperation with the Department of Museum Informatics of the Germanisches Nationalmuseum Nuremberg and the Department of Biodiversity Informatics of the Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig Bonn.
The Erlangen CRM / OWL implementation of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Changelog: https://github.com/erlangen-crm/ecrm/commits/master</rdfs:comment>
</owl:Ontology>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E1_CRM_Entity">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E1 CRM Entity</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E1 CRM Entität</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E1 Οντότητα CIDOC CRM</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E1 Entité CRM</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E1 Entidade CRM</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E1 CRM Сущность</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E1 CRM实体</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E1</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P48_has_preferred_identifier"/>
<owl:maxCardinality rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#nonNegativeInteger">1</owl:maxCardinality>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises all things in the universe of discourse of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model.
It is an abstract concept providing for three general properties:
- Identification by name or appellation, and in particular by a preferred identifier
- Classification by type, allowing further refinement of the specific subclass an instance belongs to
- Attachment of free text and other unstructured data for the expression of anything not captured by formal properties
All other classes within the CIDOC CRM are directly or indirectly specialisations of E1 CRM Entity.
Examples:
- the earthquake in Lisbon 1755 (E5) (Chester, 2001)
In First Order Logic:
- E1(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E1_CRM_Entity"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E2_Temporal_Entity">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E2 Temporal Entity</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E2 Geschehendes</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E2 Έγχρονη Οντότητα</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E2 Entité temporelle</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E2 Entidade Temporal</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E2 Временная Сущность</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E2 时序实体</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E2</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E1_CRM_Entity"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P4_has_time-span"/>
<owl:cardinality rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#nonNegativeInteger">1</owl:cardinality>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:disjointWith rdf:resource="E77_Persistent_Item"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises all phenomena, such as the instances of E4 Periods and E5 Events, which happen over a limited extent in time. This extent in time must be contiguous, i.e., without gaps. In case the defining kinds of phenomena for an instance of E2 Temporal Entity cease to happen, and occur later again at another time, we regard that the former instance of E2 Temporal Entity has ended and a new instance has come into existence. In more intuitive terms, the same event cannot happen twice.
In some contexts, such phenomena are also called perdurants. This class is disjoint from E77 Persistent Item and is an abstract class that typically has no direct instances. E2 Temporal Entity is specialized into E4 Period, which applies to a particular geographic area (defined with a greater or lesser degree of precision), and E3 Condition State, which applies to instances of E18 Physical Thing.
Examples:
- Bronze Age (E4) (Childe, 1963)
- the earthquake in Lisbon 1755 (E5) (Chester, 2001)
- the Peterhof Palace near Saint Petersburg being in ruins from 1944 – 1946 (E3) (Maddox, 2015)
In First Order Logic:
- E2(x) ⇒ E1(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E2_Temporal_Entity"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E3_Condition_State">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E3 Condition State</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E3 Zustandsphase</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E3 Κατάσταση</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E3 État matériel</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E3 Estado Material</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E3 Состояние</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E3 条件状态</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E3</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E2_Temporal_Entity"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P44i_is_condition_of"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="E18_Physical_Thing"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises the states of objects characterised by a certain condition over a time-span.
An instance of this class describes the prevailing physical condition of any material object or feature during a specific instance of E52 Time-Span. In general, the time-span for which a certain condition can be asserted may be shorter than the real time-span, for which this condition held.
The nature of that condition can be described using P2 has type. For example, the instance of E3 Condition State “condition of the SS Great Britain between 22(nd) September 1846 and 27(th) August 1847” can be characterized as an instance “wrecked” of E55 Type.
Examples:
- the "reconstructed" state of the “Amber Room” in Tsarskoje Selo from summer 2003 until now (Owen, 2009)
- the "ruined" state of Peterhof Palace near Saint Petersburg from 1944 to 1946 (Maddox, 2015)
- the state of my turkey in the oven at 14:30 on 25(th) December 2002 [P2 has type: E55 Type “still not cooked”] (fictitious)
- the topography of the leaves of Sinai Printed Book 3234.2361 on the 10(th) July 2007 [described as: of type "cockled"] (fictitious)
In First Order Logic:
- E3(x) ⇒ E2(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E3_Condition_State"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E4_Period">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E4 Period</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E4 Phase</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E4 Περίοδος</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E4 Période</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E4 Período</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E4 Период</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E4 时期</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E4</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E2_Temporal_Entity"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E92_Spacetime_Volume"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P7_took_place_at"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="E53_Place"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises sets of coherent phenomena or cultural manifestations occurring in time and space.
It is the social or physical coherence of these phenomena that identify an instance of E4 Period and not the associated spatiotemporal extent. This extent is only the “ground” or space in an abstract physical sense that the actual process of growth, spread and retreat has covered. Consequently, different periods can overlap and coexist in time and space, such as when a nomadic culture exists in the same area and time as a sedentary culture. This also means that overlapping land use rights, common among first nations, amounts to overlapping periods.
Often, this class is used to describe prehistoric or historic periods such as the “Neolithic Period”, the “Ming Dynasty” or the “McCarthy Era”, but also geopolitical units and activities of settlements are regarded as special cases of E4 Period. However, there are no assumptions about the scale of the associated phenomena. In particular all events are seen as synthetic processes consisting of coherent phenomena. Therefore, E4 Period is a superclass of E5 Event. For example, a modern clinical birth, an instance of E67 Birth, can be seen as both a single event, i.e., an instance of E5 Event, and as an extended period, i.e., an instance of E4 Period, that consists of multiple physical processes and complementary activities performed by multiple instances of E39 Actor.
As the actual extent of an instance of E4 Period in spacetime we regard the trajectories of the participating physical things during their participation in an instance of E4 Period. This includes the open spaces via which these things have interacted and the spaces by which they had the potential to interact during that period or event in the way defined by the type of the respective period or event. Examples include the air in a meeting room transferring the voices of the participants. Since these phenomena are fuzzy, we assume the spatiotemporal extent to be contiguous, except for cases of phenomena spreading out over islands or other separated areas, including geopolitical units distributed over disconnected areas such as islands or colonies.
Whether the trajectories necessary for participants to travel between these areas are regarded as part of the spatiotemporal extent or not has to be decided in each case based on a concrete analysis, taking use of the sea for other purposes than travel, such as fishing, into consideration. One may also argue that the activities to govern disconnected areas imply travelling through spaces connecting them and that these areas hence are spatially connected in a way, but it appears counterintuitive to consider for instance travel routes in international waters as extensions of geopolitical units.
Consequently, an instance of E4 Period may occupy a number of disjoint spacetime volumes, however there must not be a discontinuity in the time-span covered by these spacetime volumes. This means that an instance of E4 Period must be contiguous in time. If it has ended in all areas, it has ended as a whole. However, it may end in one area before another, such as in the Polynesian migration, and it continues as long as it is ongoing in at least one area.
We model E4 Period as a subclass of E2 Temporal Entity and of E92 Spacetime Volume. The latter is intended as a phenomenal spacetime volume as defined in CIDOC CRMgeo (Doerr & Hiebel, 2013). By virtue of this multiple inheritance, we can discuss the physical extent of an instance of E4 Period without representing each instance of it together with an instance of its associated spacetime volume. This model combines two quite different kinds of substance: an instance of E4 Period is a phenomenon while an instance of E92 Spacetime Volume is an aggregation of points in spacetime. However, the real spatiotemporal extent of an instance of E4 Period is regarded to be unique to it due to all its details and fuzziness; its identity and existence depends uniquely on the identity of the instance of E4 Period. Therefore, this multiple inheritance is unambiguous and effective and furthermore corresponds to the intuitions of natural language.
Typical use of this class in cultural heritage documentation is for documenting cultural and artistic periods. There are two different conceptualisations of ‘artistic style’, defined either by physical features or by historical context. For example, “Impressionism” can be viewed as a period in the European sphere of influence lasting from approximately 1870 to 1905 during which paintings with particular characteristics were produced by a group of artists that included (among others) Monet, Renoir, Pissarro, Sisley and Degas. Alternatively, it can be regarded as a style applicable to all paintings sharing the characteristics of the works produced by the Impressionist painters, regardless of historical context. The first interpretation is an instance of E4 Period, and the second defines morphological object types that fall under E55 Type.
A geopolitical unit as a specific case of an instance of E4 Period is the set of activities and phenomena related to the claim of power, the consequences of belonging to a jurisdictional area and an administrative system that establishes a geopolitical unit. Examples from the modern period are countries or administrative areas of countries such as districts whose actions and structures define activities and phenomena in the area that they intend to govern. The borders of geopolitical units are often defined in contracts or treaties although they may deviate from the actual practice. The spatiotemporal properties of Geopolitical units can be modelled through the properties inherited from E92 Spacetime Volume.
Another specific case of an instance of E4 Period is the actual extent of the set of activities and phenomena as evidenced by their physical traces that define a settlement, such as the populated period of Nineveh.
Examples:
- Jurassic (Hallam, 1975)
- Populated Period of Nineveh
- Imperial Rome under Marcus Aurelius
- European Bronze Age (Harrison, 2004)
- Italian Renaissance (Macdonald, 1992)
- Thirty Years War (Lee, 1991)
- Sturm und Drang (Berkoff, 2013)
- Cubism (Cox, 2000)
- The Capital of Russia (E4) [the capital of Russia in the sense of an administrative unit moved in historical times from Moscow to St Petersburg and then back to Moscow. This exemplifies an administrative unit changing place over time without temporal discontinuity]
- The settling activity of the community of Helsinki (a.k.a. Helsingfors) (E7) [the original settlement called Helsinki was located in the area of the modern airport. The community moved later to settle on the coast. This exemplifies a continued activity changing place over time without temporal discontinuity]
- Bronze Age (E4) [Bronze Age, in the sense of technological adoption, spread over disjoint areas including islands such as the British Isles without temporal discontinuity]
- Japan, the state (E4) [In 2021, the Japanese state as a political unit comprised in 6852 islands extending along the Pacific coast of Asia]
In First Order Logic:
- E4(x) ⇒ E2(x)
- E4(x) ⇒ E92(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E4_Period"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E5_Event">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E5 Event</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E5 Ereignis</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E5 Συμβάν</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E5 Événement</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E5 Evento</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E5 Событие</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E5 事件</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E5</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E4_Period"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P12_occurred_in_the_presence_of"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="E77_Persistent_Item"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises distinct, delimited and coherent processes and interactions of a material nature, in cultural, social or physical systems, involving and affecting instances of E77 Persistent Item in a way characteristic of the kind of process. Typical examples are meetings, births, deaths, actions of decision taking, making or inventing things, but also more complex and extended ones such as conferences, elections, building of a castle, or battles.
While the continuous growth of a tree lacks the limits characteristic of an event, its germination from a seed does qualify as an event. Similarly, the blowing of the wind lacks the distinctness and limits of an event, but a hurricane, flood or earthquake would qualify as an event. Mental processes are considered as events, in cases where they are connected with the material externalization of their results; for example, the creation of a poem, a performance or a change of intention that becomes obvious from subsequent actions or declarations.
The effects of an instance of E5 Event may not lead to relevant permanent changes of properties or relations of the items involved in it, for example an unrecorded performance. Of course, in order to be documented, some kind of evidence for an event must exist, be it witnesses, traces or products of the event.
While instances of E4 Period always require some form of coherence between its constituent phenomena, in addition, the essential constituents of instances of E5 Event should contribute to an overall effect; for example, the statements made during a meeting and the listening of the audience.
Viewed at a coarse level of detail, an instance of E5 Event may appear as if it had an ‘instantaneous’ overall effect, but any process or interaction of material nature in reality have an extent in time and space. At a fine level, instances of E5 Event may be analysed into component phenomena and phases within a space and timeframe, and as such can be seen as a period, regardless of the size of the phenomena. The reverse is not necessarily the case: not all instances of E4 Period give rise to a noteworthy overall effect and are thus not instances of E5 Event.
Examples:
- the birth of Cleopatra (E67) (Pomeroy, 1984)
- the destruction of Herculaneum by volcanic eruption in 79 AD (E6) (Camardo, 2013)
- World War II (E7) (Barber, 1994)
- the Battle of Stalingrad (E7) (Hoyt, 1993)
- the Yalta Conference (E7) (Harbutt, 2010)
- my birthday celebration 28-6-1995 (E7)
- the falling of a tile from my roof last Sunday (fictitious)
- the CIDOC conference 2003 (E7)
In First Order Logic:
- E5(x) ⇒ E4(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E5_Event"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E6_Destruction">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E6 Destruction</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E6 Zerstörung</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E6 Καταστροφή</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E6 Destruction</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E6 Destruição</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E6 Разрушение</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E6 破坏</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E6</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E64_End_of_Existence"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P13_destroyed"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="E18_Physical_Thing"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises events that destroy one or more instances of E18 Physical Thing such that they lose their identity as the subjects of documentation.
Some destruction events are intentional, while others are independent of human activity. Intentional destruction may be documented by classifying the event as both an instance of E6 Destruction and of E7 Activity.
The decision to document an object as destroyed, transformed or modified is context sensitive:
1. If the matter remaining from the destruction is not documented, the event is modelled solely as an instance of E6 Destruction.
2. An event should also be documented as an instance of E81 Transformation if it results in the destruction of one or more objects and the simultaneous production of others using parts or material from the original. In this case, the new items have separate identities. Matter is preserved, but identity is not.
3. When the initial identity of the changed instance of E18 Physical Thing is preserved, the event should be documented as an instance of E11 Modification.
Examples:
- the destruction of Herculaneum by volcanic eruption in 79 AD (Camardo, 2013)
- the destruction of Nineveh (E6, E7) (River, 2016)
- the breaking of a champagne glass yesterday by my dog (fictitious)
In First Order Logic:
- E6(x) ⇒ E64(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E6_Destruction"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E7_Activity">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E7 Activity</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E7 Handlung</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E7 Δράση</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E7 Activité</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E7 Atividade</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E7 Деятельность</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E7 活动</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E7</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E5_Event"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P14_carried_out_by"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="E39_Actor"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises actions intentionally carried out by instances of E39 Actor that result in changes of state in the cultural, social, or physical systems documented.
This notion includes complex, composite and long-lasting actions such as the building of a settlement or a war, as well as simple, short-lived actions such as the opening of a door.
Examples:
- the Battle of Stalingrad (Hoyt, 1993)
- the Yalta Conference (Harbutt, 2010)
- my birthday celebration 28-6-1995
- the writing of “Faust” by Goethe (E65) (Williams, 2020)
- the formation of the Bauhaus 1919 (E66) (Droste, 2006)
- calling the place identified by TGN ‘7017998’ ‘Quyunjig’ by the people of Iraq
- Kira Weber working in glass art from 1984 to 1993
- Kira Weber working in oil and pastel painting from 1993
In First Order Logic:
- E7(x) ⇒ E5(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E7_Activity"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E8_Acquisition">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E8 Acquisition</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E8 Erwerb</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E8 Απόκτηση</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E8 Acquisition</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E8 Aquisição</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E8 Событие Приобретения</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E8 采访</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E8</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E7_Activity"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P24_transferred_title_of"/>
<owl:minCardinality rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#nonNegativeInteger">1</owl:minCardinality>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises transfers of legal ownership from one or more instances of E39 Actor to one or more other instances of E39 Actor.
The class also applies to the establishment or loss of ownership of instances of E18 Physical Thing. It does not, however, imply changes of any other kinds of right. The recording of the donor and/or recipient is optional. It is possible that in an instance of E8 Acquisition there is either no donor or no recipient. Depending on the circumstances, it may describe:
1. the beginning of ownership
2. the end of ownership
3. the transfer of ownership
4. the acquisition from an unknown source
5. the loss of title due to destruction of the item
It may also describe events where a collector appropriates legal title, for example by annexation or field collection. The interpretation of the museum notion of "accession" differs between institutions. The CIDOC CRM therefore models legal ownership (E8 Acquisition) and physical custody (E10 Transfer of Custody) separately. Institutions will then model their specific notions of accession and deaccession as combinations of these.
Examples:
- the collection of a hammer-head shark of the genus Sphyrna Rafinesque, 1810 (Carchariniformes) by John Steinbeck and Edward Ricketts at Puerto Escondido in the Gulf of Mexico on 25(th) March 1940. (Steinbeck, 2000)
- the acquisition of El Greco’s painting entitled ‘The Apostles Peter and Paul’ by the State Hermitage in Saint Petersburg. (https://hermitagemuseum.org/wps/portal/hermitage/digital-collection/01.+Paintings/32730)
- the loss of my stuffed chaffinch ‘Fringilla coelebs Linnaeus, 1758’ due to insect damage last year (fictitious)
In First Order Logic:
- E8(x) ⇒ E7(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E8_Acquisition"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E9_Move">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E9 Move</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E9 Objektbewegung</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E9 Μετακίνηση</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E9 Déplacement</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E9 Locomoção</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E9 Перемещение</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E9 移动</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E9</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E7_Activity"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P27_moved_from"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="E53_Place"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P26_moved_to"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="E53_Place"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P25_moved"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="E19_Physical_Object"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises changes of the physical location of the instances of E19 Physical Object.
Note, that the class E9 Move inherits the property P7 took place at (witnessed): E53 Place. This property should be used to describe the trajectory or a larger area within which a move takes place, whereas the properties P26 moved to (was destination of), P27 moved from (was origin of) describe the start and end points only. Moves may also be documented to consist of other moves (via P9 consists of (forms part of)), in order to describe intermediate stages on a trajectory. In that case, start and end points of the partial moves should match appropriately between each other and with the overall event.
Examples:
- the relocation of London Bridge from the UK to the USA (Wildfang, 2005)
- the movement of the exhibition “Tutankhamun: Treasures of the Golden Pharaoh” between 15(th) September and 2(nd) November 2019
In First Order Logic:
- E9(x) ⇒ E7(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E9_Move"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E10_Transfer_of_Custody">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E10 Transfer of Custody</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E10 Übertragung des Gewahrsams</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E10 Μεταβίβαση Κατοχής</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E10 Changement de détenteur</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E10 Transferência de Custódia</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E10 Передача Опеки</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E10 转移监护权</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E10</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E7_Activity"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P30_transferred_custody_of"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="E18_Physical_Thing"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises transfers of the physical custody or the legal responsibility for the physical custody of objects. The recording of the donor or recipient is optional. It is possible that in an instance of E10 Transfer of Custody there is either no donor or no recipient.
Depending on the circumstances, it may describe:
1. the beginning of custody (there is no previous custodian)
2. the end of custody (there is no subsequent custodian)
3. the transfer of custody (transfer from one custodian to the next)
4. the receipt of custody from an unknown source (the previous custodian is unknown)
5. the declared loss of an object (the current or subsequent custodian is unknown)
In the event that only a single kind of transfer of custody occurs, either the legal responsibility for the custody or the actual physical possession of the object but not both, this difference should be expressed using the property P2 has type (is type of).
The sense of physical possession requires that the object of custody be in the hands of the keeper at least with a part representative for the whole. The way, in which a representative part is defined, should ensure that it is unambiguous who keeps a part and who the whole and should be consistent with the identity criteria of the kept instance of E18 Physical Thing.
The interpretation of the museum notion of "accession" differs between institutions. The CIDOC CRM therefore models legal ownership and physical custody separately. Institutions will then model their specific notions of accession and deaccession as combinations of these.
Theft is a specific case of illegal transfer of custody.
Examples:
- the delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery
- the return of Picasso’s “Guernica” to Madrid’s Prado in 1981 (Chipp, 1988)
- the transfer of custody of the work described as “Von der Velden ein Ufer an der See” from Johann Matthäus von Merian to the Auction House Heldevier (Jacob) for the purpose of sale, ca. 1716
- the transfer of custody of the painting ‘Mrs. Fitzherbert’ to the art dealer Knoedler from Parke-Bernet Galleries (New York, NY, USA) ca. March 1941
In First Order Logic:
- E10(x) ⇒ E7(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E10_Transfer_of_Custody"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E11_Modification">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E11 Modification</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E11 Bearbeitung</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E11 Τροποποίηση</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E11 Modification</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E11 Modificação</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E11 Событие Изменения</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E11 修改</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E11</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E7_Activity"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P31_has_modified"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="E18_Physical_Thing"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises instances of E7 Activity that are undertaken to create, alter or change instances of E24 Physical Human-Made Thing.
This class includes the production of an item from raw materials and other so far undocumented objects. It also includes the conservation treatment of an object.
Since the distinction between modification and production is not always clear, modification is regarded as the more generally applicable concept. This implies that some items may be consumed or destroyed in an instance of E11 Modification, and that others may be produced as a result of it. An event should also be documented using an instance of E81 Transformation if it results in the destruction of one or more objects and the simultaneous production of others using parts or material from the originals. In this case, the new items have separate identities.
An activity undertaken on an object which was designed to alter it, but which, in fact, it did not in any seemingly significant way (such as the application of a solvent during conservation which failed to dissolve any part of the object), is still considered as an instance of E11 Modification. Typically, any such activity will leave at least forensic traces of evidence on the object.
If the instance of E29 Design or Procedure utilized for the modification prescribes the use of specific materials, they should be documented using property P68 foresees use of (use foreseen by): E57 Material of E29 Design or Procedure, rather than via P126 employed (was employed in): E57 Material.
Examples:
- the construction of the SS Great Britain (E12) (Gregor, 1971)
- the impregnation of the Vasa warship in Stockholm for preservation after 1956 (Håfors, 2010)
- the transformation of the Enola Gay into a museum exhibit by the National Air and Space Museum in Washington DC between 1993 and 1995 (E12, E81) (Yakel, 2000)
- the last renewal of the gold coating of the Toshogu shrine in Nikko, Japan (Cali and Dougil, 2012)
In First Order Logic:
- E11(x) ⇒ E7(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E11_Modification"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E12_Production">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E12 Production</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E12 Herstellung</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E12 Παραγωγή</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E12 Production</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E12 Produção</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E12 Событие Производства</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E12 生产</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E12</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E11_Modification"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E63_Beginning_of_Existence"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P108_has_produced"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="E24_Physical_Human-Made_Thing"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises activities that are designed to, and succeed in, creating one or more new items.
It specializes the notion of modification into production. The decision as to whether or not an object is regarded as new is context sensitive. Normally, items are considered “new” if there is no obvious overall similarity between them and the consumed items and material used in their production. In other cases, an item is considered “new” because it becomes relevant to documentation by a modification. For example, the scribbling of a name on a potsherd may make it a voting token. The original potsherd may not be worth documenting, in contrast to the inscribed one.
This entity can be collective: the printing of a thousand books, for example, would normally be considered a single event.
An event should also be documented using an instance of E81 Transformation if it results in the destruction of one or more objects and the simultaneous production of others using parts or material from the originals. In this case, the new items have separate identities and matter is preserved, but identity is not.
Examples:
- the construction of the SS Great Britain (Gregor, 1971)
- the first casting of the Little Mermaid from the harbour of Copenhagen (Dewey, 2003)
- Rembrandt’s creating of the seventh state of his etching “Woman sitting half dressed beside a stove”, 1658, identified by Bartsch Number 197 (E12, E65, E81) (Hind, 1923)
In First Order Logic:
- E12(x) ⇒ E11(x)
- E12(x) ⇒ E63(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E12_Production"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E13_Attribute_Assignment">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E13 Attribute Assignment</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E13 Merkmalszuweisung</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E13 Απόδοση Ιδιοτήτων</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E13 Affectation d'attribut</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E13 Atribuição de Característica</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E13 Присвоение Атрибута</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E13 属性赋值</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E13</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E7_Activity"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P140_assigned_attribute_to"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="E1_CRM_Entity"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises the actions of making assertions about one property of an object or any single relation between two items or concepts. The type of the property asserted to hold between two items or concepts can be described by the property P177 assigned property of type (is type of property assigned): E55 Type.
For example, the class describes the actions of people making propositions and statements during certain scientific/scholarly procedures, e.g., the person and date when a condition statement was made, an identifier was assigned, the museum object was measured, etc. Which kinds of such assignments and statements need to be documented explicitly in structures of a schema rather than free text, depends on whether this information should be accessible by structured queries.
This class allows for the documentation of how the respective assignment came about, and whose opinion it was. Note that all instances of properties described in a knowledge base are the opinion of someone. Per default, they are the opinion of the team maintaining the knowledge base. This fact must not individually be registered for all instances of properties provided by the maintaining team, because it would result in an endless recursion of whose opinion was the description of an opinion. Therefore, the use of instances of E13 Attribute Assignment marks the fact, that the maintaining team is in general neutral to the validity of the respective assertion, but registers someone else’s opinion and how it came about.
All properties assigned in such an action can also be seen as directly relating the respective pair of items or concepts. Multiple use of instances of E13 Attribute Assignment may possibly lead to a collection of contradictory values.
All cases of properties in this model that are also described indirectly through a subclass of E13 Attribute Assignment are characterised as "short cuts" of a path via this subclass. This redundant modelling of two alternative views is preferred because many implementations may have good reasons to model either the action of assertion or the short cut, and the relation between both alternatives can be captured by simple rules.
Examples:
- the examination of MS Sinai Greek 418 by Nicholas Pickwoad in November 2003 (Honey & Pickwoad, 2010)
- the assessment of the current ownership of Martin Doerr’s silver cup in February 1997 (fictitious)
In First Order Logic:
- E13(x) ⇒ E7(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E13_Attribute_Assignment"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E14_Condition_Assessment">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E14 Condition Assessment</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E14 Zustandsfeststellung</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E14 Εκτίμηση Κατάστασης</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E14 Expertise de l'état matériel</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E14 Avaliação do Estado Material</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E14 Оценка Состояния</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E14 状态评估</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E14</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E13_Attribute_Assignment"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P35_has_identified"/>
<owl:minCardinality rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#nonNegativeInteger">1</owl:minCardinality>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P34_concerned"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="E18_Physical_Thing"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class describes the act of assessing the state of preservation of an object during a particular period.
The condition assessment may be carried out by inspection, measurement or through historical research. This class is used to document circumstances of the respective assessment that may be relevant to interpret its quality at a later stage, or to continue research on related documents.
Examples:
- last year’s inspection of humidity damage to the frescos in the St. George chapel in our village (fictitious)
- the condition assessment of the endband cores of MS Sinai Greek 418 by Nicholas Pickwoad in November 2003 (Honey & Pickwoad, 2010)
- the condition assessment of the cover of MS Sinai Greek 418 by Nicholas Pickwoad in November 2003 (Honey & Pickwoad, 2010)
In First Order Logic:
- E14(x) ⇒ E13(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E14_Condition_Assessment"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E15_Identifier_Assignment">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E15 Identifier Assignment</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E15 Kennzeichenzuweisung</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E15 Απόδοση Αναγνωριστικού</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E15 Attribution d’identificateur</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E15 Atribuição de Identificador</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E15 Назначение Идентификатора</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E15 标识符赋值</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E15</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E13_Attribute_Assignment"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P37_assigned"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="E42_Identifier"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises activities that result in the allocation of an identifier to an instance of E1 CRM Entity. Instances of E15 Identifier Assignment may include the creation of the identifier from multiple constituents, which themselves may be instances of E41 Appellation. The syntax and kinds of constituents to be used may be declared in a rule constituting an instance of E29 Design or Procedure.
Examples of such identifiers include Find Numbers, Inventory Numbers, uniform titles in the sense of librarianship and Digital Object Identifiers (DOI). Documenting the act of identifier assignment and deassignment is especially useful when objects change custody or the identification system of an organization is changed. In order to keep track of the identity of things in such cases, it is important to document by whom, when and for what purpose an identifier is assigned to an item.
The fact that an identifier is a preferred one for an organisation can be expressed by using the property E1 CRM Entity. P48 has preferred identifier (is preferred identifier of): E42 Identifier. It can better be expressed in a context independent form by assigning a suitable E55 Type, such as “preferred identifier assignment”, to the respective instance of E15 Identifier Assignment via the P2 has type property.
Examples:
- replacement of the inventory number TA959a by GE34604 for a 17(th) century lament cloth at the Museum Benaki, Athens
- assigning the author-uniform title heading “Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von, 1749-1832. Faust. 1. Theil.” for the respective work
- on 1(st) June 2001 assigning the personal name heading “Guillaume, de Machaut, ca. 1300-1377” to Guillaume de Machaut (Kelly, 2014)
In First Order Logic:
- E15(x) ⇒ E13(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E15_Identifier_Assignment"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E16_Measurement">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E16 Measurement</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E16 Messung</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E16 Μέτρηση</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E16 Mesurage</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E16 Medição</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E16 Событие Измерения</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E16 测量</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E16</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E13_Attribute_Assignment"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P40_observed_dimension"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="E54_Dimension"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P39_measured"/>
<owl:cardinality rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#nonNegativeInteger">1</owl:cardinality>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises actions measuring quantitative physical properties and other values that can be determined by a systematic, objective procedure of direct observation of particular states of physical reality.
An instance of E16 Measurement may use simple counting or tools, such as yardsticks or radiation detection devices. The interest is in the method and care applied, so that the reliability of the result may be judged at a later stage, or research continued on the associated documents. The date of the event is important for dimensions, which may change value over time, such as the length of an object subject to shrinkage. Methods and devices employed should be associated with instances of E16 Measurement by properties such as P33 used specific technique: E29 Design or Procedure, P125 used object of type: E55 Type, P16 used specific object (was used for): E70 Thing, whereas basic techniques such as "carbon-14 dating" should be encoded using P2 has type (is type of): E55 Type. Details of methods and devices reused or reusable in other instances of E16 Measurement should be documented for these entities rather than the measurements themselves, whereas details of particular execution may be documented by free text or by instantiating adequate sub-activities, if the detail may be of interest for an overarching query.
Regardless whether a measurement is made by an instrument or by human senses, it represents the initial transition from physical reality to information without any other documented information object in between within the reasoning chain that would represent the result of the interaction of the observer or device with reality. Therefore, determining properties of an instance of E90 Symbolic Object is regarded as an instance of E13 Attribute Assignment, which may be inferred from observing and measuring representative carriers. In the case that the carrier can be named, the property P16 used specific object (was used for): should be used to indicate the instance(s) of E18 Physical Thing that was used as the empirical basis for the attribute assignment. For instance, inferring properties of depicted items using image material, such as satellite images, is not regarded as an instance of E16 Measurement, but as a subsequent instance of E13 Attribute Assignment. Rather, only the production of the images, understood as arrays of radiation intensities, is regarded as an instance of E16 Measurement. The same reasoning holds for other sensor data.
Examples:
- measurement of the height of silver cup 232 on 31(st) August 1997 (fictitious)
- the carbon 14 dating of the “Schoeninger Speer II” in 1996 [The carbon 14 dating of an approximately 400.000 year old complete Old Palaeolithic wooden spear found in Schoeningen, Niedersachsen, Germany, in 1995.] (Kouwenhoven, 1997)
In First Order Logic:
- E16(x) ⇒ E13(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E16_Measurement"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E17_Type_Assignment">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E17 Type Assignment</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E17 Typuszuweisung</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E17 Απόδοση Τύπου</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E17 Attribution de type</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E17 Atribuição de Tipo</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E17 Присвоение Типа</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E17 类型赋值</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E17</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E13_Attribute_Assignment"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P41_classified"/>
<owl:cardinality rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#nonNegativeInteger">1</owl:cardinality>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P42_assigned"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="E55_Type"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises the actions of classifying items of whatever kind. Such items include objects, specimens, people, actions and concepts.
This class allows for the documentation of the context of classification acts in cases where the value of the classification depends on the personal opinion of the classifier, and the date that the classification was made. This class also encompasses the notion of "determination," i.e., the systematic and molecular identification of a specimen in biology.
Examples:
- the first classification of object GE34604 as Lament Cloth at the Museum Benaki, Athens
- the determination of a cactus in Martin Doerr’s garden as ‘Cereus hildmannianus K. Schumann’, July 2003
In First Order Logic:
- E17(x) ⇒ E13(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E17_Type_Assignment"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E18_Physical_Thing">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E18 Physical Thing</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E18 Materielles</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E18 Υλικό Πράγμα</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E18 Chose matérielle</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E18 Coisa Material</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E18 Физическая Вещь</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E18 实物</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E18</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E72_Legal_Object"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P13i_was_destroyed_by"/>
<owl:maxCardinality rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#nonNegativeInteger">1</owl:maxCardinality>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P45_consists_of"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="E57_Material"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P53_has_former_or_current_location"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="E53_Place"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:disjointWith rdf:resource="E28_Conceptual_Object"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises all persistent physical items with a relatively stable form, human-made or natural.
Depending on the existence of natural boundaries of such things, the CIDOC CRM distinguishes the instances of E19 Physical Object from instances of E26 Physical Feature, such as holes, rivers, pieces of land etc. Most instances of E19 Physical Object can be moved (if not too heavy), whereas features are integral to the surrounding matter.
An instance of E18 Physical Thing occupies not only a particular geometric space at any instant of its existence, but in the course of its existence it also forms a trajectory through spacetime, which occupies a real, that is phenomenal, volume in spacetime. We include in the occupied space the space filled by the matter of the physical thing and all its inner spaces, such as the interior of a box. For the purpose of more detailed descriptions of the presence of an instance of E18 Physical Thing in space and time it can be associated with its specific instance of E92 Spacetime Volume by the property P196 defines (is defined by).
The CIDOC CRM is generally not concerned with amounts of matter in fluid or gaseous states, as long as they are not confined in an identifiable way for an identifiable minimal time-span.
Examples:
- the Cullinan Diamond (E19) (Scarratt and Shor, 2006)
- the cave “Ideon Andron” in Crete (E26) (Smith, 1844-49)
- the Mona Lisa (E22) (Mohen, 2006)
In First Order Logic:
- E18(x) ⇒ E72(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E18_Physical_Thing"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E19_Physical_Object">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E19 Physical Object</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E19 Materieller Gegenstand</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E19 Υλικό Αντικείμενο</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E19 Objet matériel</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E19 Objeto Material</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E19 Физический Объект</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E19 物质对象</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E19</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E18_Physical_Thing"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P55_has_current_location"/>
<owl:maxCardinality rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#nonNegativeInteger">1</owl:maxCardinality>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P54_has_current_permanent_location"/>
<owl:maxCardinality rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#nonNegativeInteger">1</owl:maxCardinality>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises items of a material nature that are units for documentation and have physical boundaries that separate them completely in an objective way from other objects.
The class also includes all aggregates of objects made for functional purposes of whatever kind, independent of physical coherence, such as a set of chessmen. Typically, instances of E19 Physical Object can be moved (if not too heavy).
In some contexts, such objects, except for aggregates, are also called “bona fide objects” (Smith & Varzi, 2000, pp.401-420), i.e., naturally defined objects.
The decision as to what is documented as a complete item, rather than by its parts or components, may be a purely administrative decision or may be a result of the order in which the item was acquired.
Examples:
- Aphrodite of Milos (E22) (Kousser, 2005)
- the Cullinan Diamond (Scarratt and Shor, 2006)
- Apollo 13 at the time of launch (E22) (Lovell and Kluger, 1994)
In First Order Logic:
- E19(x) ⇒ E18(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E19_Physical_Object"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E20_Biological_Object">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E20 Biological Object</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E20 Biologischer Gegenstand</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E20 Βιολογικό Ακτικείμενο</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E20 Objet biologique</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E20 Objeto Biológico</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E20 Биологический Объект</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E20 生物对象</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E20</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E19_Physical_Object"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises individual items of a material nature, which live, have lived or are natural products of or from living organisms.
Artificial objects that incorporate biological elements, such as Victorian butterfly frames, can be documented as both instances of E20 Biological Object and E22 Human-Made Object.
Examples:
- me (fictitious)
- Tut-Ankh-Amun (Edwards and Boltin, 1979)
- Boukephalus [Horse of Alexander the Great] (Lamb, 2005)
- petrified dinosaur excrement PA1906-344
In First Order Logic:
- E20(x) ⇒ E19(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E20_Biological_Object"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E21_Person">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E21 Person</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E21 Person</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E21 Πρόσωπο</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E21 Personne</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E21 Pessoa</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E21 Личность</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E21 人物</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E21</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E20_Biological_Object"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E39_Actor"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P98i_was_born"/>
<owl:cardinality rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#nonNegativeInteger">1</owl:cardinality>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P152_has_parent"/>
<owl:minCardinality rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int">2</owl:minCardinality>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises real persons who live or are assumed to have lived.
Legendary figures that may have existed, such as Ulysses and King Arthur, fall into this class if the documentation refers to them as historical figures. In cases where doubt exists as to whether several persons are in fact identical, multiple instances can be created and linked to indicate their relationship. The CIDOC CRM does not propose a specific form to support reasoning about possible identity.
In a bibliographic context, a name presented following the conventions usually employed for personal names will be assumed to correspond to an actual real person (an instance of E21 Person), unless evidence is available to indicate that this is not the case. The fact that a persona may erroneously be classified as an instance of E21 Person does not imply that the concept comprises personae.
Examples:
- Tut-Ankh-Amun (Edwards and Boltin, 1979)
- Nelson Mandela (Brown and Hort, 2006)
In First Order Logic:
- E21(x) ⇒ E20(x)
- E21(x) ⇒ E39(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E21_Person"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E22_Human-Made_Object">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E22 Human-Made Object</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E22</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E19_Physical_Object"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E24_Physical_Human-Made_Thing"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises all persistent physical objects of any size that are purposely created by human activity and have physical boundaries that separate them completely in an objective way from other objects.
The class also includes all aggregates of objects made for functional purposes of whatever kind, independent of physical coherence, such as a set of chessmen.
Examples:
- the Rosetta Stone (E22)
- LNER Class A4 4468 Mallard [the World’s fastest steam locomotive, preserved at the National Railway Museum of York, UK] (Solomon, 2003)
- the Portland Vase (Walker, 2004)
In First Order Logic:
- E22(x) ⇒ E19(x)
- E22(x) ⇒ E24(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E22_Human-Made_Object"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E24_Physical_Human-Made_Thing">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E24 Physical Human-Made Thing</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E24</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E18_Physical_Thing"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E71_Human-Made_Thing"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P108i_was_produced_by"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="E12_Production"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises all persistent physical items of any size that are purposely created by human activity. This class comprises, besides others, Human-Made objects, such as a sword, and Human-Made features, such as rock art. For example, a “cup and ring” carving on bedrock is regarded as instance of E24 Physical Human-Made Thing.
Instances of Human-Made thing may be the result of modifying pre-existing physical things, preserving larger parts or most of the original matter and structure, which poses the question if they are new or even Human-Made, the respective interventions of production made on such original material should be obvious and sufficient to regard that the product has a new, distinct identity and intended function and is human-made. Substantial continuity of the previous matter and structure in the new product can be documented by describing the production process also as an instance of E81 Transformation.
Whereas interventions of conservation and repair are not regarded to produce a new Human-Made thing, the results of preparation of natural history specimens that substantially change their natural or original state should be regarded as physical Human-Made things, including the uncovering of petrified biological features from a solid piece of stone. On the other side, scribbling a museum number on a natural object should not be regarded to make it Human-Made. This notwithstanding, parts, sections, segments, or features of a physical Human-Made thing may continue to be non-Human-Made and preserved during the production process, for example natural pearls used as a part of an eardrop.
Examples:
- the Forth Railway Bridge (Shipway, Bouch, Baker and Fowler, 1990).
- the Channel Tunnel (E25) (Holliday, Marcou and Vickerman, 1991)
- the Palace of Knossos (Evans, 1921)
- the Colosseum in Rome, Italy (Hopkins and Beard, 2011)
- the Historical Collection of the Museum Benaki in Athens (E78) (Georgoula, 2005)
- the Rosetta Stone (E22)
- my paperback copy of Crime & Punishment (E22) (fictitious)
- the computer disk at ICS-FORTH that stores the canonical Definition of the CIDOC CRM v.3.2 (E22)
- my empty DVD disk (E22) (fictitious)
In First Order Logic:
- E24(x) ⇒ E18(x)
- E24(x) ⇒ E71(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E24_Physical_Human-Made_Thing"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E25_Human-Made_Feature">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E25 Human-Made Feature</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E25</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E24_Physical_Human-Made_Thing"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E26_Physical_Feature"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises physical features that are purposely created by human activity, such as scratches, artificial caves, artificial water channels, etc. In particular, it includes the information encoding features on mechanical or digital carriers.
Examples:
- the Manchester Ship Canal (Farnie, 1980)
- Michael Jackson’s nose following plastic surgery
- the laser-readable “pits” engraved June 2014 on Martin Doerr’s CD-R, copying songs of Edith Piaf.
- the carved letters on the Rosetta Stone
In First Order Logic:
- E25(x) ⇒ E24(x)
- E25(x) ⇒ E26(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E25_Human-Made_Feature"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E26_Physical_Feature">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E26 Physical Feature</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E26 Materielles Merkmal</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E26 Υλικό Μόρφωμα</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E26 Caractéristique matérielle</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E26 Característica Material</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E26 Физический Признак</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E26 物理特征</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E26</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E18_Physical_Thing"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P56i_is_found_on"/>
<owl:minCardinality rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#nonNegativeInteger">1</owl:minCardinality>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises identifiable features that are physically attached in an integral way to particular physical objects.
Instances of E26 Physical Feature share many of the attributes of instances of E19 Physical Object. They may have a one-, two- or three-dimensional geometric extent, but there are no natural borders that separate them completely in an objective way from the carrier objects. For example, a doorway is a feature but the door itself, being attached by hinges, is not.
Instances of E26 Physical Feature can be features in a narrower sense, such as scratches, holes, reliefs, surface colours, reflection zones in an opal crystal or a density change in a piece of wood. In the wider sense, they are portions of particular objects with partially imaginary borders, such as the core of the Earth, an area of property on the surface of the Earth, a landscape or the head of a contiguous marble statue. They can be measured and dated, and it is sometimes possible to state who or what is or was responsible for them. They cannot be separated from the carrier object, but a segment of the carrier object may be identified (or sometimes removed) carrying the complete feature.
This definition coincides with the definition of "fiat objects" (Smith & Varzi, 2000, pp.401-420), with the exception of aggregates of “bona fide objects”.
Examples:
- the cave of Dirou, Mani, Greece (Psimenos. 2005)
- the temple in Abu Simbel before its removal, which was carved out of solid rock (E25) (Hawass, 2000)
- Albrecht Duerer's signature on his painting of Charles the Great (E25) (Strauss, 1974)
- the damage to the nose of the Great Sphinx in Giza (Temple, 2009)
- Michael Jackson’s nose prior to plastic surgery
In First Order Logic:
- E26(x) ⇒ E18(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E26_Physical_Feature"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E27_Site">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E27 Site</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E27 Gelände</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E27 Φυσικός Χώρος</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E27 Site</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E27 Lugar</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E27 Участок</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E27 场地</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E27</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E26_Physical_Feature"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises pieces of land or sea floor.
In contrast to the purely geometric notion of E53 Place, this class describes constellations of matter on the surface of the Earth or other celestial body, which can be represented by photographs, paintings and maps.
Instances of E27 Site are composed of relatively immobile material items and features in a particular configuration at a particular location.
Examples:
- the Amazon river basin (Hegen, 1966)
- Knossos (Evans, 1921)
- the Apollo 11 landing site (Siegler and Smrekar, 2014)
- Heathrow Airport (Wicks, 2014)
- the submerged harbour of the Minoan settlement of Gournia, Crete (Watrous, 2012)
- the island of Crete
In First Order Logic:
- E27(x) ⇒ E26(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E27_Site"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E28_Conceptual_Object">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E28 Conceptual Object</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E28 Begrifflicher Gegenstand</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E28 Νοητικό Αντικείμενο</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E28 Objet conceptuel</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E28 Objeto Conceitual</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E28 Концептуальный Объект</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E28 概念对象</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E28</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E71_Human-Made_Thing"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P94i_was_created_by"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="E65_Creation"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises non-material products of our minds and other human produced data that have become objects of a discourse about their identity, circumstances of creation or historical implication. The production of such information may have been supported by the use of technical devices such as cameras or computers.
Characteristically, instances of this class are created, invented or thought by someone, and then may be documented or communicated between persons. Instances of E28 Conceptual Object have the ability to exist on more than one particular carrier at the same time, such as paper, electronic signals, marks, audio media, paintings, photos, human memories, etc.
They cannot be destroyed. They exist as long as they can be found on at least one carrier or in at least one human memory. Their existence ends when the last carrier and the last memory are lost.
Examples:
- Beethoven’s “Ode an die Freude” (Ode to Joy) (E73) (Kershaw, 1999)
- the definition of “ontology” in the Oxford English Dictionary (E73) (Oxford University Press, 1989)
- the knowledge about the victory at Marathon carried by the famous runner (E89) (Lagos & Karyanos, 2020)
- [Explanation note: In the following examples we illustrate the distinction between a propositional object, its names and its encoded forms. The Maxwell equations (Ball, 1962) are a good example, because they belong to the fundamental laws of physics and their mathematical content yields identical, unambiguous results regardless formulation and encoding.]
- “Maxwell equations” (E41) [preferred subject access point from LCSH, http://lccn.loc.gov/sh85082387, accessed 18(th) April 2021. This is only the name for the Maxwell equations as standardized by the Library of Congress and not the equations themselves.]
- “Equations, Maxwell” (E41) [variant subject access point from LCSH, http://lccn.loc.gov/sh85082387, accessed 18(th) April 2021. This is another name for the equation standardized by the Library of Congress and not the equations themselves.]
- Maxwell's equations (E89) [This is the propositional content of the equations proper, independent of any particular notation or mathematical formalism.] (Ball, 1962)
- The encoding of Maxwells equations as in https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c4/Maxwell%27sEquations.svg (E73) [accessed 18(th) April 2021. This is one possible symbolic encoding of the propositional content of the equations.]
In First Order Logic:
- E28(x) ⇒ E71(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E28_Conceptual_Object"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E29_Design_or_Procedure">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E29 Design or Procedure</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E29 Entwurf oder Verfahren</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E29 Σχέδιο</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E29 Conception ou procédure</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E29 Projeto ou Procedimento</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E29 Проект или Процедура</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E29 设计或程序</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E29</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E73_Information_Object"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises documented plans for the execution of actions in order to achieve a result of a specific quality, form or contents. In particular, it comprises plans for deliberate human activities that may result in new instances of E71 Human-Made Thing or for shaping or guiding the execution of an instance of E7 Activity.
Instances of E29 Design or Procedure can be structured in parts and sequences or depend on others.
This is modelled using P69 has association with (is associated with): E29 Design or Procedure.
Designs or procedures can be seen as one of the following
1. A schema for the activities it describes
2. A schema of the products that result from their application.
3. An independent intellectual product that may have never been applied, such as Leonardo da Vinci’s famous plans for flying machines.
Because designs or procedures may never be applied or only partially executed, the CIDOC CRM models a loose relationship between the plan and the respective product.
Examples:
- the ISO standardisation procedure
- the musical notation for Beethoven’s “Ode to Joy” (Kershaw, 1999)
- the architectural drawings for the Kölner Dom (Cologne Cathedral) in Cologne, Germany (Wolff, 1999)
- the drawing on the folio 860 of the Codex Atlanticus from Leonardo da Vinci, 1486-1490, kept in the Biblioteca Ambrosiana in Milan
In First Order Logic:
- E29(x) ⇒ E73(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E29_Design_or_Procedure"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E30_Right">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E30 Right</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E30 Recht</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E30 Δικαίωμα</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E30 Droit</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E30 Direitos</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E30 Право</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="zh">E30 权限</rdfs:label>
<skos:notation>E30</skos:notation>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="E89_Propositional_Object"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="P104i_applies_to"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="E72_Legal_Object"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Scope note:
This class comprises legal privileges concerning material and immaterial things or their derivatives.
These include reproduction and property rights.
Examples:
- copyright held by ISO on ISO/CD 21127
- ownership of the “Mona Lisa” by the museum of the Louvre, Paris, France
In First Order Logic:
- E30(x) ⇒ E89(x)
</rdfs:comment>
<owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E30_Right"/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="E31_Document">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">E31 Document</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="de">E31 Dokument</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="el">E31 Τεκμήριο</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">E31 Document</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="pt">E31 Documento</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="ru">E31 Документ</rdfs:label>