Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(babel-preset-css-prop): correcting invalid information in examples #2245

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 8, 2021

Conversation

safethecode
Copy link
Contributor

@safethecode safethecode commented Feb 7, 2021

fixed #2245

What: Incorrect information was corrected in the example.

Why: The information needs to be modified because the open source user can be confused due to incorrect information.

How: Successfully modified examples part in README in @emotion/babel-preset-css-prop.

Checklist:

  • Documentation
  • Tests
  • Code complete
  • Changeset

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Feb 7, 2021

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 9d6a39a

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
@emotion/babel-preset-css-prop Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@codesandbox-ci
Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Feb 7, 2021

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 9d6a39a:

Sandbox Source
Emotion Configuration

Copy link
Member

@emmatown emmatown left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants