You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Apultra is an excellent compression algorithm with great compression ratios. As an optimization enthusiast, I would like to propose a way to significantly improve Apultra's performance while maintaining the integrity of compression.
The idea is to invert certain cycles to reduce processor cache misses. For example, the following cycle can be inverted:
for (int n = 0; n < numElements; n++) {
if (condition) {
// ...
}
}
Into:
for (int n = numElements - 1; n >= 0; n--) {
if (condition) {
// ...
}
}
Benefits of this approach:
Improves memory locality and cache utilization by accessing memory sequentially
Reduces branch mispredictions
Enables better instruction pipelining
With cycle inversion, we can optimize hot loops that dominate the compression ratios like the ones in apultra_optimize_forward, hash search cycles, and other auxiliary algorithms.
My benchmarks demonstrate [2-4x] performance improvements with these optimizations while maintaining bit-exact output on multiple datasets.
It would be great if you can assess the viability of including cycle inversion in Apultra's core optimization pipeline. Please let me know if any other details are required. These micro-optimizations can significantly improve the real-world speed of compression without affecting accuracy.
I optimize apultra_optimize_forward and receive good results.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Apultra is an excellent compression algorithm with great compression ratios. As an optimization enthusiast, I would like to propose a way to significantly improve Apultra's performance while maintaining the integrity of compression.
The idea is to invert certain cycles to reduce processor cache misses. For example, the following cycle can be inverted:
Into:
Benefits of this approach:
With cycle inversion, we can optimize hot loops that dominate the compression ratios like the ones in apultra_optimize_forward, hash search cycles, and other auxiliary algorithms.
My benchmarks demonstrate [2-4x] performance improvements with these optimizations while maintaining bit-exact output on multiple datasets.
It would be great if you can assess the viability of including cycle inversion in Apultra's core optimization pipeline. Please let me know if any other details are required. These micro-optimizations can significantly improve the real-world speed of compression without affecting accuracy.
I optimize
apultra_optimize_forward
and receive good results.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: