Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NETGEAR DGN1000 vulnerable #27

Closed
monga opened this issue Jan 3, 2014 · 7 comments
Closed

NETGEAR DGN1000 vulnerable #27

monga opened this issue Jan 3, 2014 · 7 comments

Comments

@monga
Copy link

monga commented Jan 3, 2014

I can confirm the vulnerability on this model (Firmware Version V1.1.00.46_ww).

Thank you for your work.

@elvanderb
Copy link
Owner

Thank you, I updated the list :)
Do you know if there is any difference between your router and the other DGN1000 mentionned in the readme?

@monga
Copy link
Author

monga commented Jan 3, 2014

No, I don't, sorry: they are very likely to be the same. I've sent the issue message just to document also the firmware version.

@elvanderb
Copy link
Owner

Ok, thank you :)

@stirech
Copy link

stirech commented Feb 14, 2014

Has anyone found a alternative firmware that can be applied. DD-WRT? Open WRT & Tomato don't have firmware for this router. I have tried to block the port using exiting firmware without success.

@zmaile
Copy link

zmaile commented Apr 7, 2014

I brought this issue up with netgear support (2014/01/17), and just in the last few days they have released a new firmware version that resolves the port 32764 issue. The new firmware is available on their website (http://downloadcenter.netgear.com/other/)

I've confirmed that the below version works correctly.
http://www.downloads.netgear.com/files/GDC/DGN1000/DGN1000-V1.1.00.49WW.zip

If the original backdoor was a planned 'feature', then its possible that there is a knocking sequence required to unlock port 32764 (that is, port 32764 opens after trying port 5000, then 8000 before 32764 as an example).

@elvanderb
Copy link
Owner

I'll have a look, thank you :)

@elvanderb
Copy link
Owner

Oh god :')
Expect some lolz in the next few days :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants