Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ML] Should be possible to update DFA memory estimate after adding exclude fields #60496

Closed
droberts195 opened this issue Mar 18, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #62850
Closed
Assignees
Labels
Feature:Data Frame Analytics ML data frame analytics features :ml v7.8.0

Comments

@droberts195
Copy link
Contributor

This is a follow-on from #60486. In the example job of that issue the original memory estimate was 644.9mb. To bring this down I added exclude fields. However, the estimate did not change when I did this. After adding quite a few exclude fields I manually reduced the model memory limit to 410mb, created the job, and started it. This revealed that the estimate with the excluded fields had reduced to 559.7mb.

Screenshot 2020-03-18 at 11 13 48

However, having to create the job before being able to see the effect of the exclude fields will cause frustration. Maybe it's too much to re-estimate memory use on every edit to the exclude fields, but there should be a way to do it (e.g. 2 seconds after the last change to exclude fields or on clicking a button to explicitly ask).

@droberts195 droberts195 added :ml Feature:Data Frame Analytics ML data frame analytics features labels Mar 18, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/ml-ui (:ml)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature:Data Frame Analytics ML data frame analytics features :ml v7.8.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants