You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a follow-on from #60486. In the example job of that issue the original memory estimate was 644.9mb. To bring this down I added exclude fields. However, the estimate did not change when I did this. After adding quite a few exclude fields I manually reduced the model memory limit to 410mb, created the job, and started it. This revealed that the estimate with the excluded fields had reduced to 559.7mb.
However, having to create the job before being able to see the effect of the exclude fields will cause frustration. Maybe it's too much to re-estimate memory use on every edit to the exclude fields, but there should be a way to do it (e.g. 2 seconds after the last change to exclude fields or on clicking a button to explicitly ask).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a follow-on from #60486. In the example job of that issue the original memory estimate was
644.9mb
. To bring this down I added exclude fields. However, the estimate did not change when I did this. After adding quite a few exclude fields I manually reduced the model memory limit to410mb
, created the job, and started it. This revealed that the estimate with the excluded fields had reduced to559.7mb
.However, having to create the job before being able to see the effect of the exclude fields will cause frustration. Maybe it's too much to re-estimate memory use on every edit to the exclude fields, but there should be a way to do it (e.g. 2 seconds after the last change to exclude fields or on clicking a button to explicitly ask).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: