Support Hierarchical Facets #1076
Comments
|
Maybe this newly committed Lucene faceting module will provide the Hierarchical Faceting, so ES doesn't have to reinvent its own variant? |
|
+1 |
|
+1 on this. I really need this feature for my project. |
|
+1 Looking forward to this feature!! |
|
+1 |
23 similar comments
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
6 similar comments
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1, last time I looked at the Hierarchical Faceting ticket of Lucene, it is still open. Anyway, this one feature is going to be a killer feature of Lucene and ES. |
|
In the meantime, there is one possible solution for hierarchical facets: http://www.springyweb.com/2012/01/hierarchical-faceting-with-elastic.html I haven't tried it personally, but on the surface I would imagine this approach would work. |
|
+1 and many more Is someone working on this or is there any progress, even conceptual, to report? |
|
+1 |
|
Hm the cited Lucene ticket seems to have been merged into Lucene 4.0. |
|
hope so |
|
+1 |
1 similar comment
|
+1 |
|
+1 please please please |
|
On the Boston Elasticsearch Meetup/Google Hangout last week, I believe the ES team mentioned that this was slated tentatively for the 1.0 release. If I'm wrong, someone please correct me. Can't seem to find the recording. |
|
We spent time designing a new facets infrastructure, that will support this feature inherently. It is currently planned for the 1.0 release, though I must admit it is very ambitious. It is highly important and we will make all the effort to make sure it makes it to 1.0. |
|
@kimchy Does it rely on DocValues at the core? |
|
@otisg thats nto really relevant to if facets are hierarchical or not... |
|
True, true. Would it be true to say that in 1.0 there be heavy use of DocValues, including for faceting? |
|
Lucene facets support hierarchical faceting oob but the tricky part is getting them to be distributed and the fact they would need to be defined in the mapping since they build a data-structure separate from the main index on disk. It would be neat to expose this functionality. |
|
@otisg In general, yes, we hope to expose doc values, and then things will work just the same, regardless if they use doc values, or do the uninverting from terms into memory. @mattweber we have other ideas on how to implement composable facets that will enable the range of functionality we are after (a bit different compared to the current lucene faceting implementation). |
|
I'm very intersting by this functionnality +1 |
|
+1 I would like a term stats facets with a date histogram for each term |
|
For all the +1ers, please see #3300. |
|
+1 This would help out a lot. |
|
Yep, I saw it. I have downloaded beta version yet. We are in middle of a launch but I am excited to give it a try! |
and others
This seems to be a popular request. This feature would allow hierarchical facets on fields that are not necessarily numeric, thus allowing faceting that looks like this, for example:
Media Type Facets:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: