Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Facilitate filebeat autodiscovery with hints annotation #1978

Closed
pebrc opened this issue Oct 11, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2439
Closed

Facilitate filebeat autodiscovery with hints annotation #1978

pebrc opened this issue Oct 11, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2439
Assignees
Labels
>enhancement Enhancement of existing functionality

Comments

@pebrc
Copy link
Collaborator

pebrc commented Oct 11, 2019

When creating Elasticsearch pods we could add a default filebeat annotation

    podTemplate:
      metadata:
        annotations:
          "co.elastic.logs/module": elasticsearch

which would allow filebeat autodiscovery to configure the Elasticsearch filebeat module for the Elasticsearch clusters created by ECK which in turn would give us nicely parsed logs:

Screenshot 2019-10-11 at 14 36 19

and integration with the Stack Monitoring feature in Kibana

Screenshot 2019-10-11 at 14 38 25

I see no harm in the additional annotation for users who don't use filebeat or don't use autodiscovery.

A similar annotation exists for Kibana:

 podTemplate:                                                                                                                                         
    metadata:                                                                                                                                          
      annotations:                                                                                                                                     
        co.elastic.logs/module: kibana     
@pebrc pebrc added >enhancement Enhancement of existing functionality discuss We need to figure this out labels Oct 11, 2019
@pebrc pebrc mentioned this issue Oct 24, 2019
3 tasks
@pebrc pebrc removed the discuss We need to figure this out label Jan 14, 2020
@thbkrkr thbkrkr self-assigned this Jan 16, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
>enhancement Enhancement of existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants