-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
clean nodegroup deletion #536
Labels
area/aws-vpc
area/deletions
area/general-cli
area/nodegroup
kind/improvement
priority/important-longterm
Important over the long term, but may not be currently staffed and/or may require multiple releases
Comments
Maybe related to aws/amazon-vpc-cni-k8s#69. |
This was referenced Apr 5, 2019
Merged
Fixing this would pave the road towards fixing other issue with deletions. |
3 tasks
@2opremio is this finished? |
martina-if
added
the
priority/important-longterm
Important over the long term, but may not be currently staffed and/or may require multiple releases
label
Apr 14, 2020
5 tasks
nikimanoledaki
changed the title
clean nodegroup deletion
Sep 6, 2021
eksctl delete cluster
should delete all nodegroups and their associated resources
nikimanoledaki
changed the title
clean nodegroup deletion
Sep 6, 2021
eksctl delete cluster
should delete all nodegroups and their associated resources
This was referenced Sep 9, 2021
What was left to do was draining the nodegroups and deleting the daemonsets. This was addressed so this issue can be closed now. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
area/aws-vpc
area/deletions
area/general-cli
area/nodegroup
kind/improvement
priority/important-longterm
Important over the long term, but may not be currently staffed and/or may require multiple releases
As mentioned earlier in #523 (comment), we need to devise a better strategy for nodegroup deletion, which should also help us with #103 and #274 (as well as other related issues).
So we should try implementing the following strategy:
Ingress
We may do something different for deleting individual nodegroups, e.g. only scale drain, taint and down, but we do need to implement this first, as deletion is an important aspect of user experience.
related: #2278, #2172
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: