You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To properly judge the representational adequacy of a particular module of the model, and the model of the whole, it would be good to know what use case is driving. I suggest the following:
Every module page gets a human-readable description of the use case attached to it. That can be a couple of sentences describing the use case(s) that it is addressing. In a perfect world, maybe next year, this could be explicitly linked to an EJP use case description.
The use case is operationalised as a SPARQL query. This will make judging non-obvious questions easier: should something be modelled as a class or an individual? Etc etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To properly judge the representational adequacy of a particular module of the model, and the model of the whole, it would be good to know what use case is driving. I suggest the following:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: