Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reproduction of the results. #4

Open
vincrichard opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Reproduction of the results. #4

vincrichard opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@vincrichard
Copy link

vincrichard commented Jun 17, 2024

Sorry to disturb you again.
I have been trying to reproduce the result on the Tox21 dataset with your code and the weights shared, I unfortunately did not manage to do so. I ran:

python finetune.py --dataset tox21

And obtained the following results attached, where the logs display at the end of the eval loop is presented.
The best result is for epoch 88 (corresponding to line 88 of the file) with [INFO|finetune.py:299] 2024-06-17T15:47:55+0900 > train: 0.000000 val: 0.786658 test: 0.757151

This is pretty far from the 76.5 included in the paper, I know it is a mean over 10 runs, but I am wondering if the finetuning code is up-to-date ? What were the 10 seed you used for obtaining your results ?

There is also a small mistake at

for key in self.data.keys:

Where it should be keys()

Full result of the run:
finetuning.txt

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant