Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a project type for every ready-to-go stack #839

Closed
ddementieva opened this issue Mar 26, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Add a project type for every ready-to-go stack #839

ddementieva opened this issue Mar 26, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
kind/epic A long-lived, PM-driven feature request. Must include a checklist of items that must be completed.

Comments

@ddementieva
Copy link
Contributor

"For all of the codenvy OOTB stacks, we should have very basic PT w/ no options that generates shell project of that type with commands. This would enable wizard driven."

For example it includes "php", "nodejs", etc project-types

@ddementieva ddementieva added the kind/epic A long-lived, PM-driven feature request. Must include a checklist of items that must be completed. label Mar 26, 2016
@ddementieva
Copy link
Contributor Author

(Comment by Florent Benoit)

so I've written this issue when I was in a review

More details on this issue

today, we have out of the box stacks categorized as Ready-to-go stacks like java, php, nodejs, etc.

The goal of the issue is to add a new project type (PT) for all the technologies provided by these ready-to-go stacks

so it means, introducing a php project-type, nodejs project type, etc.

It will then allow to be able to create project with a wizard for these new types while today we only have maven or blank choice

@ddementieva
Copy link
Contributor Author

(Comment by Tyler Jewell)

Want to discuss this a bit later...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/epic A long-lived, PM-driven feature request. Must include a checklist of items that must be completed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant