Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: fix numbered list format according to commonmark format #58

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 26, 2023

Conversation

echo724
Copy link
Owner

@echo724 echo724 commented Dec 26, 2023

Added

  • tests for numbered list

Modified

from this change the output of numbered list will be:

1. list1
1. list2

even if the number list is sequenced.

Removed

None

Note

thanks to @redgeoff, added and modified new numbered list format and tests.

redgeoff and others added 3 commits September 3, 2023 07:43
from this change the output of numbered list will be:
```
1. list1
1. list2
```
even if the number list is sequenced.
@echo724 echo724 merged commit 163c155 into main Dec 26, 2023
1 check failed
@echo724 echo724 deleted the fix/numbered-list branch December 26, 2023 08:54
echo724 added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2023
* test: fix numbered list

* fix: numbered list requires local state

* fix: change numbered list format according to commonmark

from this change the output of numbered list will be:
```
1. list1
1. list2
```
even if the number list is sequenced.

---------

Co-authored-by: Geoff Cox <redgeoff@gmail.com>
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2023
## [2.8.4](v2.8.3...v2.8.4) (2023-12-28)

### Bug Fixes

* fix numbered list format according to commonmark format ([#58](#58)) ([305ec68](305ec68))
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2023
## [2.8.4](v2.8.3...v2.8.4) (2023-12-28)

### Bug Fixes

* fix numbered list format according to commonmark format ([#58](#58)) ([305ec68](305ec68))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants