Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Failures on Mono Android x64 Release @ Ubuntu.1804.Amd64.Android.29.Open on rolling build of runtime-extra-platforms #69678

Closed
mkhamoyan opened this issue May 23, 2022 · 7 comments · Fixed by #69693

Comments

@mkhamoyan
Copy link
Contributor

Description

runtime-extra-platform build fails with
Interop_PInvoke.Int128_Int128Test_Int128Test._Int128_Int128Test_Int128Test_sh() and IT_opt.OSR_pinnedlocal_pinnedlocal._OSR_pinnedlocal_pinnedlocal_sh(), return code is -1.

It started failing from this build 1779269
I can see that in that build was merged this commit 04d5bbc

Reproduction Steps

Check last rolling build of runtime-extra-platforms https://runfo.azurewebsites.net/view/build/?number=1779269)

Expected behavior

Tests should pass

Actual behavior

Build fails with
Interop_PInvoke.Int128_Int128Test_Int128Test._Int128_Int128Test_Int128Test_sh() and IT_opt.OSR_pinnedlocal_pinnedlocal._OSR_pinnedlocal_pinnedlocal_sh(), return code is -1.

Regression?

No response

Known Workarounds

No response

Configuration

No response

Other information

No response

@ghost ghost added the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label May 23, 2022
@dotnet-issue-labeler
Copy link

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this issue. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 23, 2022

Tagging subscribers to 'arch-android': @steveisok, @akoeplinger
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Description

runtime-extra-platform build fails with
Interop_PInvoke.Int128_Int128Test_Int128Test._Int128_Int128Test_Int128Test_sh() and IT_opt.OSR_pinnedlocal_pinnedlocal._OSR_pinnedlocal_pinnedlocal_sh(), return code is -1.

It started failing from this build 1779269
I can see that in that build was merged this commit 04d5bbc

Reproduction Steps

Check last rolling build of runtime-extra-platforms https://runfo.azurewebsites.net/view/build/?number=1779269)

Expected behavior

Tests should pass

Actual behavior

Build fails with
Interop_PInvoke.Int128_Int128Test_Int128Test._Int128_Int128Test_Int128Test_sh() and IT_opt.OSR_pinnedlocal_pinnedlocal._OSR_pinnedlocal_pinnedlocal_sh(), return code is -1.

Regression?

No response

Known Workarounds

No response

Configuration

No response

Other information

No response

Author: mkhamoyan
Assignees: -
Labels:

os-android, untriaged

Milestone: -

@mkhamoyan
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkhamoyan commented May 23, 2022

@AntonLapounov could you please take a look? seems after this commit tests started to fail

@AntonLapounov
Copy link
Member

@tannergooding This might be caused by #69204.

@tannergooding
Copy link
Member

@AntonLapounov This test is supposed to be skipped on Android (and Mono in general) until #69531 can be resolved.

https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/src/tests/issues.targets#L1776-L1778 which falls under https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/src/tests/issues.targets#L1464-L1465

@tannergooding
Copy link
Member

Happy to extend some other ItemGroup if needed but it's not clear what's missing if anything to me.

@mkhamoyan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fanyang-mono opened a PR which seems will fix the issue

@fanyang-mono fanyang-mono self-assigned this May 24, 2022
@fanyang-mono fanyang-mono removed the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label May 24, 2022
@ghost ghost added the in-pr There is an active PR which will close this issue when it is merged label May 24, 2022
@ghost ghost removed the in-pr There is an active PR which will close this issue when it is merged label May 24, 2022
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 24, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants