Remove duplicate term definitions for Classes #206
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
RexJaeschke
changed the title
BillWagner
approved these changes
Jan 14, 2021
when ready.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@BillWagner: I think I made this more complicated than need be. The text I needed to edit was in branch feature-expression-bodied-members (which feeds into the pending PR #4), and I started with that as base. But instead of saving it back to that branch, I saved it to new branch Rex-resolve-term-dupe-defs-in-classes. And now I have this new PR to make that change. Presumably, I should have smuggled this change on the back of PR 4.
This PR addresses part 2 of 2 in Issue #40.