You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The centroid lon / lat data in the netCDF patch data represents the the longitude / latitude values at the center of the patch, not the center of the object, and thus there are mis-matches between centroid lon / lat in the CSV files and netCDF files for the same storm objects.
Is there any reason to keep the patch-center derived lons / lats? If not, the values could be replaced using the same process to generate the centroids for the CSV file.
The centroid lon / lat data in the netCDF patch data represents the the longitude / latitude values at the center of the patch, not the center of the object, and thus there are mis-matches between centroid lon / lat in the CSV files and netCDF files for the same storm objects.
hagelslag/bin/hsdata
Lines 642 to 645 in 57d1051
Is there any reason to keep the patch-center derived lons / lats? If not, the values could be replaced using the same process to generate the centroids for the CSV file.
hagelslag/bin/hsdata
Lines 454 to 455 in 57d1051
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: