-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 223
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Build error thanks to bitvec vs funty #522
Comments
Should keep the comment as there is really no good reason for Askama to depend on funty, but would otherwise be happy to take a PR! I've been pushing on the nom side to fix the situation there but it doesn't look like there'll be much progress soon. |
Thanks @djc - I've send a patch. |
you can now use nom 7, which fixes the issues with bitvec |
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I have a project using
askama@0.10.5
andmysql@21.0.0
which leaves me with the followingThe key thing (if I understood this) is that here we have
bitvec@0.19.4
.Elsewhere in my dependency tree I have:
bitvec@0.22.3
andfunty@1.2.0
work well enough together as evidenced by a min project I put together with just the two of them, but the build specifically mentions0.19.4
:I reported it here because we have here in
askama
asnom@6.1.1
as a dependency is inherited here.nom@6.2.1
has a fix, apparently which allows newer versions ofbitvec
rust-bakery/nom#1311 (comment)I tried in a small patch, something like:
This seems to work locally, and
cargo clean && cargo test
seems to be ✔️ - I'd be happy to send a PR for that, and bumping version numbers and the release notes/etc. Please just let me know. I'm switching my project to my own git fork ofaskama
and check if it's working.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: