Requesting to include the strong naming for the Scintilla5.Net assembly

[KalyaniURS]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
After referencing the Scintilla.NET NuGet package (v5.6.1/v5.6.0) in our project, we encountered a build issue indicating that a strong name is required. Below is the mentioned error occurred while building the solution.

error MC1000: Unknown build error, 'Could not load file or assembly 'Scintilla.NET, Version=5.6.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' or one of its dependencies. A Strongly-named assembly is required. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131044)

Describe the solution you'd like
Request to include the strong naming for the assemblies used while referring to the nuget package.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context

[desjarlais]

There is an ongoing discussion about this already:

#100

I think the workaround of forking the repo and making that a signed version would be a better idea than trying to incorporate it into this one...but I am open to other ideas.

[ahmetsait]

@desjarlais I don't see why signing this lib is such a big deal?

[desjarlais]

I haven't researched what it would take to add it to the project so I'll take a look at what that entails. It would be a nice to have, I just haven't looked into the possible issues it could cause yet.

[desjarlais]

This should be fixed in 5.6.2

[thehill383]

came to reserach the exact same issue and found its just been resolved😀