Linter specific functionality #3959
Replies: 2 comments
-
Posting implementations of |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
ALE's stance if for @w0rp to decide but my opinion on this is that all contributions that improve ALE's LSP support are welcome. The switch command seems to be non-standard and only specific of ocaml language server. In this case I would say this should not be part of ALE itself and instead ALE should provide methods that allow easy implementation of such features so users can include them in their configs. Provide documentation in wiki with known implementations like this one. The documentSymbol is standard LSP and welcome addition to ALE with some modifications:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm wondering what's the stance on adding functionality to ALE which is specific to some LSP linter.
Specifically ocamllsp implements a set of custom commands (link to docs) and I'd really love to use them with ALE.
I've hacked some into my config but I believe this will be useful for a wider ALE's userbase. Should I propose a pull request with such functionality?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions