Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for unimplemented mappings #184

Closed
uki00a opened this issue Nov 3, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

Support for unimplemented mappings #184

uki00a opened this issue Nov 3, 2020 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority
Milestone

Comments

@uki00a
Copy link
Member

uki00a commented Nov 3, 2020

Summary

When using types that are not implemented in decode.ts, the following error occurs:

Error: Don't know how to parse column type: <oid>

The following is a list of oids for which mapping is not yet supported:

Please see 117#issuecomment-683205862 for details.

Related issues

@Soremwar
Copy link
Collaborator

Soremwar commented Jan 31, 2021

After adding support for some of these types in the last days, I have decided that I will ship an "starter pack" of types that will have official support from the library. I have nearly completed that list, only lacking support for geometry types and date arrays.

After that list is completed, the default behavior of the app when it can't parse a result will be to return it as a string to the user, leaving up to them any possible transformation they want to make. From there, I will review possible data types to support officially on a case by case basis.

@Soremwar
Copy link
Collaborator

4376f4e just enabled string result as a default

@Soremwar Soremwar self-assigned this Sep 29, 2021
@Soremwar Soremwar added this to the v1.0.0 milestone Sep 29, 2021
@Soremwar
Copy link
Collaborator

Before 1.0, all types that must be parsed as something other than a string must be scratched from this list

@Soremwar Soremwar unpinned this issue Sep 29, 2021
@bombillazo bombillazo added enhancement New feature or request priority labels Feb 4, 2024
@bombillazo
Copy link
Collaborator

bombillazo commented Feb 4, 2024

We need to keep tracking these., We can use this as inspiration. Many of those oids are also highly specialized, not sure all need to be parsed, just the most used ones.

@bombillazo
Copy link
Collaborator

bombillazo commented Feb 5, 2024

Closing to track in a new issue #446

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants