You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 8, 2021. It is now read-only.
Put all thoughts and discussions about tech that don't already have a topic issue open in this section. If it's a large enough issue, please consider opening a separate topic on it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We don't need to add much more tech other then more support companies would be fine.
With that said here are some tech's I'd like to see added to the extend tech mod.
-Great War Motorized. Getting this tech would give you access the motorized support companies. Allowing poor countries to access support companies that benefit them the most. e.a field hospitals faster. Trade off being cost more to produce, slower speed, and -5% hardness
-Seaplane tender. One off ship tech, Stats of 1922 light cruiser but worse in ever area by 10%. Holds 5 planes though. Branches into first light carrier.
-Foward recon company. acts as a recon company but instead takes armor cars, and gives small boost to breakthrough with a small decrease in recon
It would be good to extend our techs into the early 60s.
There should be a LOT more tech dependencies. I mean, one tech needed other techs to go forward - rather than just the previous one in line. I think this will solve the "running ahead" tech issue where people just blast their way through on computers, for example. If we made computers dependent on resource or industry advances, it would slow it down. Also, this will allow us to have more advanced techs but still manage the pace.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Put all thoughts and discussions about tech that don't already have a topic issue open in this section. If it's a large enough issue, please consider opening a separate topic on it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: