Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: login page looks bad when narrow #1428

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2023
Merged

fix: login page looks bad when narrow #1428

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2023

Conversation

dsmmcken
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #1399

Add missing class prefix of modified login form.

Add missing class prefix of modified login form.
@dsmmcken dsmmcken requested a review from mofojed July 31, 2023 16:01
@dsmmcken dsmmcken self-assigned this Jul 31, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 31, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1428 (3933b8d) into main (d131b05) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1428   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   45.71%   45.71%           
=======================================
  Files         511      511           
  Lines       35065    35065           
  Branches     8767     8767           
=======================================
  Hits        16029    16029           
  Misses      18985    18985           
  Partials       51       51           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 45.71% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@mofojed mofojed merged commit 6e0b60e into main Aug 3, 2023
5 checks passed
@mofojed mofojed deleted the dmckenzie_1399 branch August 3, 2023 14:40
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 3, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Login page looks bad when narrow
2 participants