You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If Alice writes a record to Alice's DWN, Alice will see did:alice in the record's author field. When Alice sends that record to Bob's DWN, and Bob retrieves the record from Bob's DWN, he'll see did:bob in the record's author field.
Steps to reproduce:
Spin up a session for Alice and a session for Bob
As Alice, write a record and log the record
Send the record to Bob
As Bob, query for the record and log the record
Confirm each record's recordId is the same
Observe each record's author field. Alice's copy will have her DID in the author field while Bob's copy will have his DID in the author field.
Expected behaviour:
Should both Alice's copy of the record and Bob's copy of the record reflect Alice's DID in the author field? Opening this issue for discussion, guidance, and/or addressing this use case here.
Summary
If Alice writes a record to Alice's DWN, Alice will see
did:alice
in the record'sauthor
field. When Alice sends that record to Bob's DWN, and Bob retrieves the record from Bob's DWN, he'll seedid:bob
in the record'sauthor
field.Steps to reproduce:
recordId
is the sameauthor
field. Alice's copy will have her DID in theauthor
field while Bob's copy will have his DID in theauthor
field.Expected behaviour:
Should both Alice's copy of the record and Bob's copy of the record reflect Alice's DID in the
author
field? Opening this issue for discussion, guidance, and/or addressing this use case here.Additional information:
May or may not be related to the code here, which constructs the returned record where both
author
andtarget
values arethis.connectedDID
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: