You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While using this keccak implementation, I've noticed that it is exceptionally low on any kind of tests for such a popular crate.
Was this an intentional decision or tests were just never focused on?
We implemented a bunch of tests in our own repo for a wrapper around tiny-keccak, and we were wondering if the maintainers of this repository would be open to letting us create a PR adding these tests to tiny-keccak directly?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While using this keccak implementation, I've noticed that it is exceptionally low on any kind of tests for such a popular crate.
Was this an intentional decision or tests were just never focused on?
We implemented a bunch of tests in our own repo for a wrapper around tiny-keccak, and we were wondering if the maintainers of this repository would be open to letting us create a PR adding these tests to tiny-keccak directly?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: