Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

File properties UI #5058

Closed
stevemessick opened this issue Sep 10, 2012 · 6 comments
Closed

File properties UI #5058

stevemessick opened this issue Sep 10, 2012 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug
Milestone

Comments

@stevemessick
Copy link
Contributor

There is no property menu on a source file entity.
Without this, it is really hard to figure out where the actual source file is located.
//Lars
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Editor: 12099 (2012-09-09)
OS: Linux - amd64 (2.6.38.8-gg944)
JVM: 1.6.0-google-v4

SDK installed: true
Dartium installed: true

@pq
Copy link
Member

pq commented Oct 15, 2012

Removed Type-Defect label.
Added Type-Enhancement label.

@pq
Copy link
Member

pq commented Oct 15, 2012

Issue #3497 has been merged into this issue.

@pq
Copy link
Member

pq commented Oct 15, 2012

Changed the title to: "File properties UI".

@danrubel
Copy link

danrubel commented Nov 9, 2012

Perhaps a first cut should be to show the full path when you hover over the file in the Files view.

@pq
Copy link
Member

pq commented Nov 18, 2012

Added Started label.

@pq
Copy link
Member

pq commented Nov 19, 2012

Implemented w/ r15119.


Added Fixed label.

@stevemessick stevemessick added this to the M2 milestone Nov 19, 2012
@kevmoo kevmoo added type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug and removed type-enhancement labels Mar 1, 2016
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants